"Constructive Criticism" and the Destruction of New Startups

Discussion in 'Hangar Flying' started by aerochristian, Feb 2, 2016.

Help Support HomeBuiltAirplanes Forum by donating:

  1. Feb 3, 2016 #41

    BJC

    BJC

    BJC

    Well-Known Member HBA Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2013
    Messages:
    9,739
    Likes Received:
    6,526
    Location:
    97FL, Florida, USA
    But your finished products are there for all to see. And you know that everyone who sees it passes judgement on it.


    BJC
     
    Turd Ferguson likes this.
  2. Feb 3, 2016 #42

    BJC

    BJC

    BJC

    Well-Known Member HBA Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2013
    Messages:
    9,739
    Likes Received:
    6,526
    Location:
    97FL, Florida, USA
    Chris:

    I have seen some of your work. I again encourage you to post here regularily, and share progress on your projects with us. Yes, many of us are critical old grouches, mostly because we have been around long enough to see way too many examples of ideas that never are realized.

    The fundamental issue, though, it this: You have designed, built, and flown your own creations, which is something that 99.999% of the posters here wish that they (I) had done, but have not done and never will do. So participate, and, by doing so, you just might set an example of behavior that others, eventually, may emulate.


    BJC
     
  3. Feb 3, 2016 #43

    Turd Ferguson

    Turd Ferguson

    Turd Ferguson

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2008
    Messages:
    4,840
    Likes Received:
    1,753
    Location:
    Upper midwest in a house
    Chris, entertainment my friend. Like any internet forum this site has good entertainment value. Pay attention and you can see self-proclaimed claimed experts passing out engineering advice and or critiquing designs even though they have no engineering degree and have never designed and built a kite (and never will).

    I noticed you have actually built and flown airplanes. Keep up the good work!
     
  4. Feb 3, 2016 #44

    MikePousson

    MikePousson

    MikePousson

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2016
    Messages:
    464
    Likes Received:
    187
    Location:
    Ontario on the bay
    I don't know any guys here personally. Most of you don't either. Ever since I was old enough to have memory, 4 or 5, I guess, every time I heard that engine sound above me I stopped doing whatever and tried to locate it in the sky. I thought, Wow, that is neat. Flash forward 65 years or more, and I still do it. EVERY TIME. Back then, it was a DC3 or a Stearman crop duster. Today, it could be anything. HB, factory, or a high flyer heading for the north polar route to Asia, usually. I guess what I'm trying to say, is that aviation is to be an awe to those that have interest in it. If there was no new design or innovation, we'd all be trying to hitch a ride on the Wright Flyer.
    There is room for everyone. I'd never criticize anyone for an ugly plane, a pricy plane, or anything in between. If I had a million bucks in the bank, the Risen or the ICON would be in my hanger. Since I am a blue collar pensioner, I don't have a million bucks to toss around. I'm just trying to figure out how to make life work and build a $20 grand toy. But it don't make me stop yearning for $200 grand toy.
    As far as an aircraft price point goes. None of that is debatable. It's a business decision. I see some kit companies selling wood kits all inclusive without a 2 cycle engine or half VW for $20 grand. That's more than the sheet metal plane kit I'm looking at.
    I have a pretty good woodworking shop that's turned out a lot of beautiful furniture or kitchens. I got maybe 10% of the jobs I bid on. People want the quality and beauty to be cheap, in aviation or in life things.
    As far as people defending their products on this sounding board, I'm proud to see Alberto justify everything about the Risen. I saw his interview byDanJohnson and I was quite impressed.
    I guess that's my 2 cents, or as they say where I come from, "That's a lot of sugar for a nickel, mister"
     
  5. Feb 3, 2016 #45

    steveair2

    steveair2

    steveair2

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2007
    Messages:
    973
    Likes Received:
    675
    Location:
    Dallas Texas
    Sheesh! Apologizing again this week. Sixteen hour work day had me a bit cranky. This is a great forum with many great members. I think I'll limit my post to my build thread.
     
    bmcj and SVSUSteve like this.
  6. Feb 3, 2016 #46

    wsimpso1

    wsimpso1

    wsimpso1

    Super Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2003
    Messages:
    6,008
    Likes Received:
    3,261
    Location:
    Saline Michigan
    First Comment: What you will find on an internet forum does not even resemble "a beating". These are just words with no authority and certainly no physical damage. If someone really does have the courage of their convictions, we won't stop them here, but we might warn them that new ideas are few and far between, with a lot of training and maybe experience to be able to execute on them. Last I saw, Synergy and Risen and Icon are not being stopped, they are going forward.

    Second Comment: Every man has a good idea that will not work. I know this from here and from having obtained patents and from being on a major company's patent committee. My goodness the crap that folks will present as new, novel, and workable when it is either 60+ years old or been done lots of times or does not work physically.

    Third Comment: No one likes being told that their baby is ugly, but we regularly get ugly babies put before us and earnestly asked "isn't she beautiful?"

    Billski
     
  7. Feb 3, 2016 #47

    Lemans

    Lemans

    Lemans

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2008
    Messages:
    586
    Likes Received:
    99
    Location:
    Riemst Belgium
    Really? You knew I was going to take this personaly.
    Still waiting for your answer....
     

    Attached Files:

  8. Feb 3, 2016 #48

    BoKu

    BoKu

    BoKu

    Well-Known Member HBA Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2013
    Messages:
    2,359
    Likes Received:
    3,004
    Location:
    Western US
    With no answer in eight years, I think it safe to assume one is not in the cards now.

    So, how's the engine coming along?
     
    Lemans likes this.
  9. Feb 3, 2016 #49

    Lemans

    Lemans

    Lemans

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2008
    Messages:
    586
    Likes Received:
    99
    Location:
    Riemst Belgium
    Eight years?
    Explain.
    Or is this the problem we are talking about?
     
  10. Feb 3, 2016 #50

    Midniteoyl

    Midniteoyl

    Midniteoyl

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2003
    Messages:
    2,406
    Likes Received:
    500
    Location:
    Indiana
    Well that was dumb.. seriously. You expect to tease and troll the membership but have the moderators 'protect you'?
     
    Lemans, SVSUSteve and Topaz like this.
  11. Feb 3, 2016 #51

    D Hillberg

    D Hillberg

    D Hillberg

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2010
    Messages:
    1,158
    Likes Received:
    425
    Location:
    very low low low earth orbit
    If life gives you 'Lemans' . . . make lemanaid. . . . .
     
  12. Feb 3, 2016 #52

    Dan Thomas

    Dan Thomas

    Dan Thomas

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2008
    Messages:
    4,873
    Likes Received:
    2,083
    Exactly. Too many kids in school (and at home) are praised for everything and criticized for nothing, all in the name of protecting self-esteem. Self-esteem is important, but it's way over the top these days and kids come out of school feeling entitled to endless praise and affirmation and protection from the harsh realities of life. It's something of a shock when the boss fires them because they won't or can't do the job properly. We're not doing a good job of preparing young people anymore. Everybody gets a gold star and a diploma.
     
  13. Feb 3, 2016 #53

    Lemans

    Lemans

    Lemans

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2008
    Messages:
    586
    Likes Received:
    99
    Location:
    Riemst Belgium
    OK, I see this is going nowhere. My posts have drawn more than 100.000 views in 8 years time and all of a sudden I'm a troll. Strange guy's I must say.
     
  14. Feb 3, 2016 #54

    BoKu

    BoKu

    BoKu

    Well-Known Member HBA Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2013
    Messages:
    2,359
    Likes Received:
    3,004
    Location:
    Western US
    Ah, my bad; I saw the date in the upper left corner and thought it was the post date, when in fact it is the join date. Apologies for the confusion.

    Thanks, Bob K.
     
    Lemans, clanon and bmcj like this.
  15. Feb 3, 2016 #55

    BoKu

    BoKu

    BoKu

    Well-Known Member HBA Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2013
    Messages:
    2,359
    Likes Received:
    3,004
    Location:
    Western US
    To a degree that nobody should be comfortable with, the history of aviation is written in blood. And red ink, but that's not nearly as consequential. The best way to prevent more of it in the future is to reflect on that spilled in the past.

    As for new and novel ideas, my favorite curmudgeon in that regard is Don Lancaster, whose Energy Fundamentals and How to Bash Pseudoscience (.pdf docs) should be required texts for every high school student.

    Thanks, Bob K.
     
  16. Feb 3, 2016 #56

    Topaz

    Topaz

    Topaz

    Super Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2005
    Messages:
    13,873
    Likes Received:
    5,482
    Location:
    Orange County, California
    I thought, perhaps, that this was where your point was coming from. I'm glad you brought it up.

    Synergy is, perhaps, the perfect example of the scenario I held to "never work" here: Show up, proclaim that you have a "revolutionary" idea, and then proceed to not release any significant detail because you're "protecting your intellectual property." Why on Earth would you expect us to cheerlead something that makes claims to being "revolutionary", yet we aren't given enough facts for qualified people to perform an adequate evaluation? That's asking us to cheerlead something on the faith that the inventor has created something great, just because "I say so."

    Even with what limited information was given, people here far more knowledgeable than I were becoming increasingly skeptical of John's claims for the aircraft. That may have been simply the inherent conservatism of aviation that I alluded to in my earlier post. Or those highly experienced people just may know what they're talking about.

    The fact that the Synergy project has seemingly vanished within a few months of cashing in a $100k+ Kickstarter campaign doesn't exactly increase their credibility. While I'm explicitly not calling them a "scam" (we have rules here about that), the fact that their situation is looking more and more like other failed projects such as DreamWings doesn't make me any more comfortable about their prospects - or their claims.

    If and when Synergy flies and proves out their claims, I will give them all due congratulations and credit for their accomplishment. When that happens. But until that time, I'm not going to cheerlead a project where extraordinary claims are made, but the means to evaluate them has been withheld.

    YMMV, of course, and that's your choice.
     
    Lemans, Battler Britton, BoKu and 5 others like this.
  17. Feb 3, 2016 #57

    Topaz

    Topaz

    Topaz

    Super Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2005
    Messages:
    13,873
    Likes Received:
    5,482
    Location:
    Orange County, California
    Orion died. Rutan is retired and working on his own projects. We get Barnaby Wainfan here from time to time. Most of the others have legitimate IP considerations, and the remainder probably want to have a level of discussion above what we can accommodate and still allow neophytes to be full members with a full voice.
     
    Lemans, BoKu and SVSUSteve like this.
  18. Feb 3, 2016 #58

    Topaz

    Topaz

    Topaz

    Super Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2005
    Messages:
    13,873
    Likes Received:
    5,482
    Location:
    Orange County, California
    Malish is probably the perfect example. When he first showed up, skepticism ran very high. He has thoroughly and completely won over the majority of the boards by simple virtue of showing that yes, his team's airplane is not only more than a fantasy paper airplane, but actually does what they claim it does. All of us have the choice to decide that we might not want that particular airplane, or might do some part of it differently, but there's no denying that Malish's project does as he claims and simply works.

    If the others with extraordinary claims were to do as much, I'm absolutely positive that they'd find a more accepting reception.
     
  19. Feb 3, 2016 #59

    Himat

    Himat

    Himat

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 5, 2011
    Messages:
    2,811
    Likes Received:
    653
    Location:
    Norway
    Rutan is maybe not on this forum, but at least one of his team is and keep us regularly updated. Also when reading, it look like some of the pseudonym poster have an insight into the aerospace business they probably could not have without working in the business. There are some great heads of the industry posting here, maybe not the most recognized names, but even for me that is outside the business I can recognize some that have to be on the inside.
     
    Lemans likes this.
  20. Feb 3, 2016 #60

    Wanttaja

    Wanttaja

    Wanttaja

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2013
    Messages:
    1,271
    Likes Received:
    1,467
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    Yep. We don’t really know how many (or if) top homebuilt designers are involved in this forum. Allow me to list some other reasons they might not be participating. We’ll use a fictional designer named Sidney Slipstick as an example.

    1. Most of us, after a long day at work, want to do something different. After putting 8-10 hours into aircraft design work, why would Sidney watch a bunch of amateurs try to design? Only real reason is that he’d find it entertaining…might even mock some of the concepts himself. We’d hope Sidney would be nicer than this, but it’s certainly a possibility.

    Being a decent guy, Sidney, of course, tries to mentor upcoming designers. But he’s more likely to do that in-person, with a mentee he can directly monitor, than catch-as-catch can on a random aviation forum.

    2. Sidney designs airplanes as his employment…probably even owns the company. Why in the world would he splatter his latest design ideas in a public forum? He’s just hurting himself. So, if he participates in HBA, he doesn’t join the string of “What do you think of this idea” posters.

    3. If Sidney DOES post publicly, then he’ll be seeing a bunch of “Sidney Slipstick, Please Look at my Design” postings. If he critiques one, then others will demand equal time. If he ignores them all, he’s "stuck up." If he’s negative about someone’s refrigerator drawing, then he’s "a meanie who doesn’t help aspiring designers." It’s a lose-lose situation.

    4. Sidney can get in trouble just being AROUND people expounding their neat ideas. Say Sidney’s been working on an airfoil modification for five years, and is ready to go into production. Then somebody posts a refrigerator drawing that shows “kinda” the same thing. When Sidney’s new design is announced the refrigerator magnate claims his idea was stolen by Sidney. If he finds the right lawyer, he can sue and tie up Sidney’s new design for years.

    Note that this can happen even if Sidney is participating anonymously. If a subpoena shows Sidney was reading the guys stuff UNDER A FALSE NAME, it looks even worse in court.

    This is why many major authors don’t participate in online forums that discuss their work or, especially, speculate on where their characters might do in later works.

    5. Sidney will also become the target of people who, for some reason, don’t like him. Every post followed by accusations, etc. Who needs it?

    6. Sidney’s comments will also be scrutinized by the lawyers of anyone suing him or his company. Online comments can be twisted in court. His lawyers will tell him never discuss design philosophies online, and don’t make suggestions that might lead him to get sued later if they’re not right or the receiver implements them wrong.

    Ron Wanttaja
     

Share This Page



arrow_white