Boeing - Design Issues...

Discussion in 'Rules and Regulations / Flight Safety / Better Pil' started by TXFlyGuy, Apr 11, 2019.

Help Support HomeBuiltAirplanes Forum by donating:

  1. May 13, 2019 #141

    Vigilant1

    Vigilant1

    Vigilant1

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    3,878
    Likes Received:
    1,712
    Location:
    US
    And this is the point: If at >any time< during those 2 dozen times when the Lion Air crew re-trimmed the aircraft back to normal, they had executed the published procedures (turning off the autopilot trim and the electric trim and then using the trim wheel to trim off yoke pressures), they could have flown that plane home. BTW, it's virtually the same procedure used for "runaway trim."

    Right--over 2 minutes after the anomaly began, and as airspeed continued to build, they finally turned off the trim and kept it off. At that point the control pressures may have been too great for use of the manual wheel >or< the trim motors to have had any effect. Analogy: Discharging the fire bottle after watching the fire light blink for two minutes--the spar has burned through. That's not a "defect."

    This is all covered in previous threads and posts here.
     
    Last edited: May 13, 2019
    davidb and rv6ejguy like this.
  2. May 13, 2019 #142

    Doggzilla

    Doggzilla

    Doggzilla

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2013
    Messages:
    1,795
    Likes Received:
    354
    Location:
    Everywhere USA
    It is not covered already, you literally just ignored all of the data I just posted and repeated the same information that has been disproven already. What you are saying does not agree with any of the black box information on either flight or the technical limitations.

    As I previously linked, above 230 knots the forces are too high and the jack screw only goes one way when overloaded. Down.

    Using the trim controls temporarily disabled the MCAS, but couldn't counter the trim change and bring it back to level. Every time the MCAS reengaged it went further down but wouldn't come back up.

    Don't forget the entire reason the MAX is not certified as a new aircraft is because it would not pass modern standards. The system is ancient 1950s tech in a 1960s regional budget aircraft. It was not a particularly well designed aircraft even at the time it was released.
     
  3. May 13, 2019 #143

    Vigilant1

    Vigilant1

    Vigilant1

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    3,878
    Likes Received:
    1,712
    Location:
    US
    I apologize to anyone who may have wasted time reading my exchanges with this person, and for providing any encouragement for his continued posts. I know better, but got trolled.
     
    davidb, rv6ejguy, BJC and 1 other person like this.
  4. May 13, 2019 #144

    TXFlyGuy

    TXFlyGuy

    TXFlyGuy

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2012
    Messages:
    1,463
    Likes Received:
    426
    Location:
    Republic of Texas
    And now you know why one of my career goals was to never fly a 737. And besides, they are too slow.

    Ever get stuck behind one on departure?
     
  5. May 13, 2019 #145

    TXFlyGuy

    TXFlyGuy

    TXFlyGuy

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2012
    Messages:
    1,463
    Likes Received:
    426
    Location:
    Republic of Texas
    My good friend, Southwest 737 Captain, agrees with you 100%. And yes, he has flown the MAX.
     
  6. May 13, 2019 #146

    davidb

    davidb

    davidb

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2008
    Messages:
    1,623
    Likes Received:
    429
    Location:
    Vacaville, CA
    Perhaps a better analogy is delaying putting in rudder with an engine failure or putting in the wrong rudder. Certain things require quick and correct pilot actions lest one finds oneself in an unrecoverable situation. Among other things, we practice engine failures regularly, but runaway stab trim accompanied with continuous stick shaker wasn’t exactly like anything these crews were trained to handle. Prior to these crashes, a safe assumption was crews would instinctively keep the airplane trimmed and nothing physically prevented the crews from doing just that. I suspect the continuous stick shaker was a very significant factor in distracting these crews away from the correct actions. Again, the crews didn’t have specific knowledge and training to deal with this. It’s just as much a training shortfall as it is a design shortfall, IMO.

    Part of the training moving forward is a demonstration of just how nearly uncontrollable the aircraft becomes when the trim is allowed to runaway to the extremes. But, it is still recoverable IF one is trained for it. The important thing is to realize one should always strive to keep it trimmed and know enough about the systems and procedures to achieve that.
     
    rv6ejguy and Vigilant1 like this.
  7. May 23, 2019 #147

    BJC

    BJC

    BJC

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2013
    Messages:
    9,489
    Likes Received:
    6,248
    Location:
    97FL, Florida, USA
  8. Jun 27, 2019 #148

    Bill-Higdon

    Bill-Higdon

    Bill-Higdon

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2011
    Messages:
    435
    Likes Received:
    136
    Location:
    Salem, Oregon, USA
  9. Jun 27, 2019 #149

    rv6ejguy

    rv6ejguy

    rv6ejguy

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2012
    Messages:
    3,749
    Likes Received:
    2,785
    Location:
    Calgary, Alberta, Canada
    Sulley backed up a main point I made in this thread earlier. While all the blame was heaped on Boeing (and they certainly deserve some), few people talked about the role of the FAA here in approving a design with only one AOA input and huge pitch authority. How did that ever pass engineering review? They should have told Boeing to make changes right there before the first test flight even.
     
  10. Jun 27, 2019 #150

    Hephaestus

    Hephaestus

    Hephaestus

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2014
    Messages:
    1,125
    Likes Received:
    244
    Location:
    YMM
    Can I ask a ridiculous question?

    Why isn't there a big switch with guards and safeties with absolutely no way to accidentally flip it.

    That turns off all the computer interventions? Takes the plane back to basic stick, rudder and throttles? Clearly it doesn't solve everything and we still have issues like air france where SA is an issue. But being able to return to training and "flying the plane" should be possible shouldn't it?
     
    Pops, Voidhawk9 and rv6ejguy like this.
  11. Jun 27, 2019 #151

    plncraze

    plncraze

    plncraze

    Well-Known Member HBA Supporter

    Joined:
    May 12, 2006
    Messages:
    1,556
    Likes Received:
    321
    Washington Post had a long article today about Boeing issues and the FAA having hard time forcing Boeing to take action even after promising to do so.
     
  12. Jun 28, 2019 #152

    BJC

    BJC

    BJC

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2013
    Messages:
    9,489
    Likes Received:
    6,248
    Location:
    97FL, Florida, USA
    If there are / were compliance issues (as opposed to “it would be nice ...” issues), why did the FAA have a hard time ..?

    Thanks,


    BJC
     
  13. Jun 28, 2019 #153

    Doggzilla

    Doggzilla

    Doggzilla

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2013
    Messages:
    1,795
    Likes Received:
    354
    Location:
    Everywhere USA
    Well, politics is off limits here and most of our members don't want to hear that their favorite political party neutering the authority of safety agencies actually has real life consequences.

    We caught an employee illegally hauling guns because he had a lifetime ban, and the TSA and DOT were completely unable to do anything to enforce the regulations.

    I was also told by a DOT agent that the statute of limitations on safety violations was now reduced to 90 days, and that anonymous reports or reports from third person were not allowed either now.

    This administration has butchered the authority and reach of safety agencies.

    Many agencies now require all complaints go through their websites, but do not provide more than a handful of complaint types to file. Everything else cannot be filed.

    The FMCSA is a perfect example. No verbal complaints allowed, all digital, and almost all of the violation categories have been removed. Making it impossible to report most transportation related crimes.
     
  14. Jun 28, 2019 #154

    BBerson

    BBerson

    BBerson

    Well-Known Member HBA Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2007
    Messages:
    11,827
    Likes Received:
    2,243
    Location:
    Port Townsend WA
    BJC likes this.
  15. Jun 28, 2019 #155

    rv6ejguy

    rv6ejguy

    rv6ejguy

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2012
    Messages:
    3,749
    Likes Received:
    2,785
    Location:
    Calgary, Alberta, Canada
    Hmmm if the FAA doesn't approve, you don't fly your new design and you don't make any money.

    Boeing bullies or disregards the FAA? That doesn't sound right...
     
  16. Jun 28, 2019 #156

    TFF

    TFF

    TFF

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2010
    Messages:
    11,523
    Likes Received:
    3,225
    Location:
    Memphis, TN
    The biggest problem now is the FAA is gun shy. They can’t look like fools so they are going to be so cautious that it might be quicker to design a new airplane. Of course that’s not true, but this one thing is being super scrutinized yet they are clueless on any other system that may be a problem.

    As for a switch to make it fly like a basic plane, probably not 100% possible. The fancy systems are designed to mimic the simple airplane. If the plane was designed without these systems, it would have to be considered a clean sheet design. That’s the whole point, no extra training if everything works like it’s supposed to. Less training; more pilot crossover. One pilot fits all is the goal. That is the dream goal for all airlines.
     
    davidb likes this.
  17. Jun 28, 2019 #157

    Hephaestus

    Hephaestus

    Hephaestus

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2014
    Messages:
    1,125
    Likes Received:
    244
    Location:
    YMM
    By that same logic then it should work too right?

    Airline pilot does annual checkride in a 737max sim anyway. So to pass your checkride we're going to turn off the computers and do a circuit without automation. We're not talking a dynamically unstable aircraft it just flies a bit different than a 70s 737... no different than me jumping from a Cherokee into a cherokee 6 - different, but my insurance doesn't require I do substantial training.
     
  18. Jun 28, 2019 #158

    davidb

    davidb

    davidb

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2008
    Messages:
    1,623
    Likes Received:
    429
    Location:
    Vacaville, CA
    There’s actually no “Max” simulators in operations at US carriers as of yet. The Max actually feels and handles more like older versions of the 737.

    The issues are probably better described as a divergence between engineering and training. The engineers didn’t do a good job of analyzing failure modes. Furthermore, the assumptions of pilot reactions weren’t reflective of current training practices. Us older guys probably had enough old school knowledge to handle the challenging situations but current training (especially for countries whose pilots were new to the 737) was not adequate.
     
  19. Jun 28, 2019 #159

    Hephaestus

    Hephaestus

    Hephaestus

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2014
    Messages:
    1,125
    Likes Received:
    244
    Location:
    YMM
    Meanwhile... The answer and probably simple solution to avoid the chaos was on pprune since November of 2018.
    https://www.pprune.org/rumours-news...raft-missing-off-jakarta-62.html#post10311501
    In other words - if MCAS screws up, 1 notch of flaps is all it takes to deactivate.
     
  20. Jun 28, 2019 #160

    plncraze

    plncraze

    plncraze

    Well-Known Member HBA Supporter

    Joined:
    May 12, 2006
    Messages:
    1,556
    Likes Received:
    321
     

Share This Page

arrow_white