• Welcome aboard HomebuiltAirplanes.com, your destination for connecting with a thriving community of more than 10,000 active members, all passionate about home-built aviation. Dive into our comprehensive repository of knowledge, exchange technical insights, arrange get-togethers, and trade aircrafts/parts with like-minded enthusiasts. Unearth a wide-ranging collection of general and kit plane aviation subjects, enriched with engaging imagery, in-depth technical manuals, and rare archives.

    For a nominal fee of $99.99/year or $12.99/month, you can immerse yourself in this dynamic community and unparalleled treasure-trove of aviation knowledge.

    Embark on your journey now!

    Click Here to Become a Premium Member and Experience Homebuilt Airplanes to the Fullest!

Bicycle landing gear pros and cons?

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

cluttonfred

Well-Known Member
Supporting Member
Joined
Feb 13, 2010
Messages
10,742
Location
World traveler
A quick search of HBA for the term "monowheel" will find quite a few discussions that touch on single main landing gear arrangements, but they are usually referring to the taildragger variety with single main gear ahead of the CG, a tailwheel or tailskid, and outrigger wheels or skids.

Are there any circumstances in which bicycle landing gear (main gear behind the CG, nosewheel, and outrigger wheels or skids) might be advantageous? Any special pros or cons over the taildragger monowheel layout?

To be clear, I don't mean single main gear far behind the CG like the Harrier (placed there because of the enormous lift engine in the central fuselage), I mean bicycle gear located similarly to tricycle gear on a Cessna but with only one main gear.
 
Back
Top