Anybody want to build one of these?

HomeBuiltAirplanes.com

Help Support HomeBuiltAirplanes.com:

Vigilant1

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Supporter
Joined
Jan 24, 2011
Messages
5,872
Location
US
I keep waiting for someone to explain the physics behind the idea that an eductor (correct term) can *increase thrust* by dragging extra air along with it. I think I know where the *idea* might have originated, but no takers so far on substantiating the claim of *increased thrust*.

Charlie
Okay, I'll bite.

Nomenclature varies ("eductor," "ejector," "augmentor") and is not standardized.

P.M Bevilaqua from Rockwell explains how it works in this paper.

FWIW, he calls it an "ejector."

From that document (thumbnails, click to enlarge):

1586915555763.png1586915758308.png

Some text and a diagram from another document. Note that the ejector "can almost double the thrust . . ."

1586916544407.png
1586916661544.png
 
Last edited:

ARP

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 24, 2009
Messages
316
Location
Darenth, Kent / England
Could a pulse jet handle the back pressure that a turbine in the exhaust stream would create? I’ve thought it would be fun to make a pulse jet turboshaft to power a mini bike or something but that’s always been a head-scratcher.
I see no reason why it would cause a problem. The pulsed exhaust and some of the by-pass fan air would go thorough the turbine reducing temperatures to prevent the whole thing melting. The rest of the fan air would keep the housing cool and expand providing additional energy and surrounding the high energy/noisy jet exhaust at the outlet. The valveless pulsejet/s have the intakes pointing in the same direction as the exhaust so any backfiring goes in the same direction.
 

Pilot-34

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 7, 2020
Messages
816
yes but the same wacky guy made a bicycle, much more dangerouser
build the bike frame out of thin walled aluminum, add some fireproof wings and go buzz some city

That seems like one of the most practical useful things I’ve ever seen!
I have a few miles of fence row I need to light off and burn each year.
We also have a 15 mile bike trail near here that really needs to burn its right of way each year that could find it handy.
 

Urquiola

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 23, 2013
Messages
147
Location
Madrid, Spain
Has anyone run a model plane pulse jet? Horribly noisy. One a couple of hundred times bigger, no way. Supposed the V-1 sound can make you nauseous. Would have hated flying a R-1, manned V-1, for multiple reasons.
What if you make the pulse jet blow inside a duct, this reduces noise, air from suction generated by pulse jet exhaust flowing around, this cools outer pulse jet parts, and something like the hard rubber pieces used for attaching engines to car frames to blunt vibrations from jet reaching fuselage in a wild way? Blessings +
 

Urquiola

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 23, 2013
Messages
147
Location
Madrid, Spain
Okay, I'll bite.

Nomenclature varies ("eductor," "ejector," "augmentor") and is not standardized.

P.M Bevilaqua from Rockwell explains how it works in this paper.

FWIW, he calls it an "ejector."

From that document (thumbnails, click to enlarge):

View attachment 95525View attachment 95526

Some text and a diagram from another document. Note that the ejector "can almost double the thrust . . ."

View attachment 95529
View attachment 95530
This concept has a common use in the turbine engines tested having the outflow going inside a duct, as in fig 1 above, sometimes turbojet gas outflow nozzle is a bit before or after the ejection tube entry ring, but wonder if calculations are available about overall thrust results. Yes, a common name is 'Thrust augmentation ejector nozzle', or so. Blessings +
 

henryk

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 8, 2010
Messages
5,848
Location
krakow,poland
he calls it an "ejector."

=for "cold jet"...


=DAYSON...


=Ejectors,Coanda...


=Ejector,thrust augmentation
 
Last edited:

Sockmonkey

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2014
Messages
2,060
Location
Flint, Mi, USA
What if you make the pulse jet blow inside a duct, this reduces noise, air from suction generated by pulse jet exhaust flowing around, this cools outer pulse jet parts, and something like the hard rubber pieces used for attaching engines to car frames to blunt vibrations from jet reaching fuselage in a wild way? Blessings +
Lockwood pulsejets are helped a lot by an augmentor duct, though it's generally placed just after the nozzle.

Ducts like that actually work better with a pulsing flow than a steady one.
Sticking little augmentors on the end of rear-facing exhaust pipes of a piston engine would actually give you useful amounts of thrust.
I see no reason why it would cause a problem. The pulsed exhaust and some of the by-pass fan air would go thorough the turbine reducing temperatures to prevent the whole thing melting. The rest of the fan air would keep the housing cool and expand providing additional energy and surrounding the high energy/noisy jet exhaust at the outlet. The valveless pulsejet/s have the intakes pointing in the same direction as the exhaust so any backfiring goes in the same direction.
I've seen vids on youtube of a guy doing that.

If you wanna know about pulse jets, this site has links to a lot of good stuff.
Also.
 

Latest posts

Top