Ampaire 337- largest hybrid to date takes flight

Discussion in 'Electric Propulsion' started by saini flyer, Jun 11, 2019 at 12:22 AM.

Help Support HomeBuiltAirplanes Forum by donating:

  1. Jun 11, 2019 at 12:22 AM #1

    saini flyer

    saini flyer

    saini flyer

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2010
    Messages:
    407
    Likes Received:
    105
    Location:
    Dallas, TX
  2. Jun 11, 2019 at 4:29 AM #2

    brehmel62

    brehmel62

    brehmel62

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2011
    Messages:
    83
    Likes Received:
    31
    Location:
    Farmersburg, IN USA
    I couldn't get their battery pack over 1 hour duration at 55% economy cruise (116 HP). That was at 350 watt hours/Kg and 270 Kg of battery. That seems like a far cry from the normal 6 hour flight time. Feel free to check my math.
     
  3. Jun 11, 2019 at 1:16 PM #3

    Tiger Tim

    Tiger Tim

    Tiger Tim

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2013
    Messages:
    2,733
    Likes Received:
    1,513
    Location:
    Thunder Bay
    Is the SFC of a piston engine fairly linear or is it like a turbine where it gets more and more efficient the more power it makes? If the latter, I could see the piston engine running wide open most of the flight and the electric only being used for takeoff and climb.
     
  4. Jun 11, 2019 at 1:52 PM #4

    TFF

    TFF

    TFF

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2010
    Messages:
    11,007
    Likes Received:
    2,966
    Location:
    Memphis, TN
    That is picking the obvious choice and the cheatingest choice at the same time. Handling of the plane is of course Cessna and it will fly about the same with either engine out. There is two different turbine STCs that turn it into a single. One front engined and the other rear. The rear engine one is faster. Obvious development choice but hopefully it has enough power to take off single engine on electric because that makes it useable power. That would be the only way to prove the necessity of the motor. Neat for what they are, 337s are slow for two engines so you don’t want the world full of them being passed by old 182s with the same useful load using essentially the same amount of fuel.
     
  5. Jun 11, 2019 at 2:47 PM #5

    Vigilant1

    Vigilant1

    Vigilant1

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    3,461
    Likes Received:
    1,478
    Location:
    US
    It will be interesting to see how these airplanes are treated by regulators and insurers. Once the battery is run low after the climb, if there's no longer enough juice to do a go-around or a missed approach, are you legal to execute a normal approach? Or, do you have to drone about to get the battery back up to snuff?
     
  6. Jun 11, 2019 at 6:21 PM #6

    bmcj

    bmcj

    bmcj

    Well-Known Member HBA Supporter

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2007
    Messages:
    12,492
    Likes Received:
    4,528
    Location:
    Fresno, California
    Is the intent to augment climb with the electric and cruise on the ICE, or climb with the ICE and use the electric in cruise as a sustainer?

    One issue I saw is that it looked like the electric windmilled easily while taxiing with the ICE. They will need to lock or full feather the electric during ICE-only operation to prevent windmilling drag, unless there is some sort of regeneration going on.
     
  7. Jun 12, 2019 at 2:32 AM #7

    saini flyer

    saini flyer

    saini flyer

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2010
    Messages:
    407
    Likes Received:
    105
    Location:
    Dallas, TX

Share This Page

arrow_white