#### WonderousMountain

##### Well-Known Member

Still waiting on someone to "invent" brazed brass plumbing pipe fuses.

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- Thread starter stanislavz
- Start date

Still waiting on someone to "invent" brazed brass plumbing pipe fuses.

Back when I was working for a living, it was common for electric utility transmission line protective relaying circuits to use class CC fuse holders in PT circuits, with copper tube replacing the fuse. That was an inexpensive disconnect for the rare occasion when the circuit needed to be open. (Usually for setting / maintaining / testing the relaying.)Still waiting on someone to "invent" brazed brass plumbing pipe fuses.

BJC

Could you explain it a little deeper ? According to my knowledge, most of our trusses are limited by members buckling, not by tension.

And modulus of ss steel is similar to 4130 at 200 GPa / 27000 ksi.

Buckling in this truss context is defined by three subcategories, crippling, short column buckling, and Euler buckling.

All three are functions of material gauges and Young's Modulus, and the first two are functions of compressive yield and ultimate strength. The trick with Euler buckling is to be certain of the mode, and that it's not in the transition region where mixed Euler and short column behavior occurs.

Crippling is a local buckling phenomenon independent of the length. Crippling plus short column behavior also must be considered.

Short columns are also called Johnson Columns.

Buckling in this truss context is defined by three subcategories, crippling, short column buckling, and Euler buckling.

All three are functions of material gauges and Young's Modulus, and the first two are functions of compressive yield and ultimate strength. The trick with Euler buckling is to be certain of the mode, and that it's not in the transition region where mixed Euler and short column behavior occurs.

Crippling is a local buckling phenomenon independent of the length. Crippling plus short column behavior also must be considered.

Short columns are also called Johnson Columns.

Thank you.

So this one shell also be considered, for situations below critical slenderness ratio

Find the critical load for a column using our buckling calculator.

www.omnicalculator.com

Beware - it looks like their material have wrong Yield stress'es ? (For 2024 their show 76, when other source show 345 Mpa), and critical slenderness ratio for 2024 ~ 66.

But, back to our numbers.

This one for 304 Ys at 210 Mpa:

This one for good old 1020 Ys at 340 Mpa

But it is with a a few mm for 4130 with Ys at 435 Mpa..

Thank you all for good discussion. So yes, it looks that we are facing not only Modulus for material, but we may face Yield stress too if our colums are on shorter side, than Scrit for given/new material.

Could you explain it a little deeper ? According to my knowledge, most of our trusses are limited by members buckling, not by tension.

And modulus of ss steel is similar to 4130 at 200 GPa / 27000 ksi.

Usually fuselage truss tubes in existing 4130 tube sizes are buckling limited. When all other loads are checked, some airplanes down grade to mild steel, Piper made a lot of Cubs that way. But they still had to pass not only Euler, but the Johnson criteria and crippling criteria.

Issues with most thinwall stainless are consistency of wall thickness - crippling load and buckling load are reduced with increased variation in wall thickness as you go around the tube. Euler buckling is reduced by the variation in wall thickness, and Euler buckling is 10% lower in stainless than in 4130 by E. Standard tubes are seamless tubes for a reason - welded tubes produce lower strength to weight ratios…

There are reasons the standard tubes are so favored….

Billski

Last edited:

When all other loads are checked, some airplanes down grade to mild steel, Piper made a lot of Cubs that way. But they still had to pass not only Euler, but the Johnson criteria and crippling criteria.

I can see it now... But now, especially on this point of globe - thin walled steel tubes are "unobtanium". And that ss steel is the only way to get thin walled tube.

BJC

For Cubs the longerons were 4130; the verticals are 1018. Cost savings. I think it was Taylorcraft that had the first full 4130 fuselage to be a jab at Piper.

Thank you.

So this one shell also be considered, for situations below critical slenderness ratio

View attachment 125768

Crippling lives on the left hand side of this curve in the transition from short columns to block compression.

Crippling stress is not constant at compressive yield, the mode starts at stresses less than yield then continues to a cutoff at ultimate allowable stress.

Whether you should use common materials will probably be dictated by the variety of outer diameters and wall thicknesses available.

It is critical to understand how the tubes are formed. Rolled with welded seams is usable with adequate quality assurance of the joints, but there is no question that seamless is preferred. Weld seams add a fabrication complication where tubes are telescoped, and grinding an interior seam might not be the correct solution.

Welding galvanized will kill you before it is completed.

Never ever. Just aisi 444.Welding galvanized will kill you before it is completed.

340MPa for 444, 435MPa for 4130. 22% less strength. Where the Johnson or crippling criteria are in play, that 22% could drive you to the next larger tube diameter... None of this is to say it won't work, you just have to do your homework and may have to accept some weight gain in the tube parts.

Yes. You do not need to paint it. And if you are above critical slenderness ratio - you are in same position as with 4130..But if it's stainless steel, you won't need paint ? (Always a win in my book!)

Below - you are in 10-12% lower in allowable load level or you are forced to redraw you truss for shorter sections or you need to take next size of tube.

But this lighter is in 500-700 grams region max. Or in 0.1% of mtow.

Need/want some live examples of tail load. For slow flying stol, and for faster cruiser and gentelman acrobat.

Going Orion way of 1.5mtow is an overkill for most uses. Othervise 150-180 kg from ul regulations looks and feel too small.

On your tail load, do not overlook the loads incurred in landing.

My eye caught the mount tubing first. It was welded stainless.

The owner (engineer?) came up and I asked a bit about the stainless mount. Finally, I asked about “toughness” or ductility. He didn’t understand.

Toughness is the ability of a material to absorb energy and plastically deform without fracturing. Toughness can also be defined with respect to regions of a stress–strain diagram. (for low-strain rate). Toughness is related to the area under the stress–strain curve.

material-properties.org

On your tail load, do not overlook the loads incurred in landing.

I have my numbers from far 23 i just want to show how things are different for slow stol and for fast cruiser..

- Participate in both public and private conversations with people that share your interest
- Start new threads
- See less ads

Enter your email address to join:

Thank
you! Please check your email inbox to continue.

There's already a member associated with this email
address.
Please log in or retrieve your
password.

Already
a member? Click here to log in
Register today and take advantage of membership benefits.

Enter your email address to join:

Thank you! Please check your email inbox to continue.

There's already a member associated with this email address. Please log in or retrieve your password.

Already a member? Click here to log in