About That Seating Capacity...

Discussion in 'Hangar Flying' started by Victor Bravo, Dec 14, 2019.

Help Support HomeBuiltAirplanes Forum by donating:

  1. Dec 15, 2019 #21

    BBerson

    BBerson

    BBerson

    Well-Known Member HBA Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2007
    Messages:
    12,490
    Likes Received:
    2,525
    Location:
    Port Townsend WA
    I "rode" on the back of a trike wing. The seat was higher than the front pilot and I could see above his shoulders and reach around to the yoke and fly it some.
     
  2. Dec 16, 2019 #22

    pictsidhe

    pictsidhe

    pictsidhe

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2014
    Messages:
    7,217
    Likes Received:
    2,060
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Like this?



    The pilot looks familiar...
     
  3. Dec 16, 2019 #23

    BBerson

    BBerson

    BBerson

    Well-Known Member HBA Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2007
    Messages:
    12,490
    Likes Received:
    2,525
    Location:
    Port Townsend WA
    Yeah, but not quite that high in the back seat
     
  4. Dec 16, 2019 #24

    1Bad88

    1Bad88

    1Bad88

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2012
    Messages:
    553
    Likes Received:
    94
    Location:
    Bellville, TX
    As to the first picture all I can say is "eyes forward and no talking".

    Now the Hummel Ultracruiser says that it is a single seat but Dennis Brooks on Youtube flies +1 with Spike a lot in his videos. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
     
  5. Dec 29, 2019 #25

    Mad MAC

    Mad MAC

    Mad MAC

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2004
    Messages:
    474
    Likes Received:
    210
    Location:
    Hamilton New Zealand
    One could do dual control in a stagged setup, a R22 style stick could work nicely, plus the stagged seat would be better for long flights allowing one to getting into stowage behide the pilots seat, without twisting 180 degees.
     
    Topaz likes this.
  6. Dec 29, 2019 #26

    Topaz

    Topaz

    Topaz

    Super Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2005
    Messages:
    13,963
    Likes Received:
    5,577
    Location:
    Orange County, California
    LOLOLOLOLOLOL! Ah, god, thank you for that laugh. ;)

    As for staggered seating, I love the idea, but recognize that the better half wouldn't put up with it, regardless of the engineering "positives." Since the logical baggage space for staggered seating is behind the pilot and next to the passenger, she'd inevitably compare her seat to "being back with the rest of the baggage." My response would probably result in some attorney saying, sometime later, "... and it was at this point that he was killed, your honor."
     
    gtae07, pictsidhe, Pops and 1 other person like this.
  7. Dec 29, 2019 #27

    Dana

    Dana

    Dana

    Super Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2007
    Messages:
    8,775
    Likes Received:
    3,137
    Location:
    CT, USA
    I don't know that lack of dual controls prevents one from doing a BFR in a plane, I think it's up to the CFI. After all, it is possible to do a BFR (and even a checkride!) in a single seater, with the instructor or examiner watching from the ground (in the case of a checkride, the certificate issued will have a limitation prohibiting passenger carrying).

    I don't know how my sister feels about the tandem seating in her husband's RV-8, she's never said anything about it that I recall. But for him, as a former F-106 pilot I'm sure tandem was the only choice.
     
  8. Dec 29, 2019 #28

    cluttonfred

    cluttonfred

    cluttonfred

    Well-Known Member HBA Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2010
    Messages:
    6,641
    Likes Received:
    2,381
    Location:
    World traveler
    Here's an idea...why not staggered seating with the pilot to the rear and passenger forward?

    Stagger the seats by, say 18"/45 cm, and use a half-panel in front of the pilot angled so both can see it. Then the passenger feels special rather than stuck in the back and the passenger weight (typically much heavier than baggage) is closer to the CG in a tractor-engine design. You also have very easy access to the area behind the panel for wiring, etc.

    There is also the option of tandem seating with the pilot to the rear, you can raise the pilot about 12"/30 cm with storage under the seat and then everyone has a good view. Again, it makes the passenger feel special rather than like riding on the back of a motorcycle.
     
  9. Dec 29, 2019 #29

    103

    103

    103

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2015
    Messages:
    151
    Likes Received:
    82
    Location:
    Wauwatosa WI
    Topaz likes this.
  10. Dec 29, 2019 #30

    Kyle Boatright

    Kyle Boatright

    Kyle Boatright

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2012
    Messages:
    851
    Likes Received:
    474
    Location:
    Marietta, GA
    Build a wide version of the Stewart Headwind... You're there. ;-)
     
    bmcj likes this.
  11. Dec 30, 2019 #31

    Will Aldridge

    Will Aldridge

    Will Aldridge

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2009
    Messages:
    873
    Likes Received:
    366
    Location:
    Northern Utah
    My kitfox model 1 was supposedly a 2 seater but with only 35" at the shoulders and 33 at the hips, you would have to be willing to be cozy unless you're tiny. I'm about a 95 percentile male so not tiny and I'm claustrophobic. I'm currently in process of converting it to a single seater sitting in the middle. Sitting in the middle I've measured 8" from either elbow to the sides of the plane. I start getting anxiety just thinking about being stuffed in there with another person
     
  12. Dec 30, 2019 #32

    Lendo

    Lendo

    Lendo

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2013
    Messages:
    375
    Likes Received:
    67
    Location:
    Brisbane
    Will, 30" is a good comfortable width for a single, but for a big fellow 35" would be more than adequate. I think the Cessna 172 is only 36".
    George
     
  13. Dec 30, 2019 #33

    Pops

    Pops

    Pops

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2013
    Messages:
    7,381
    Likes Received:
    6,334
    Location:
    USA.
    The JMR is built for a large pilot. Fuselage at cockpit is 28". Nearby neighbor is 6' 5" x 280 lbs and he said he was comfortable. Anything less would not be wide enough. 30" wide would be better if you could. My Falconar F12 and the Bearhawk is 42" wide for 2 people and you wouldn't want any less.
     
  14. Dec 30, 2019 #34

    Victor Bravo

    Victor Bravo

    Victor Bravo

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2014
    Messages:
    6,410
    Likes Received:
    5,190
    Location:
    KWHP, Los Angeles CA, USA
    No, the 172 is wider than that. The Taylorcraft is 39 inches, and that's about close to an early 172. The later 172's are a couple or three inches wider than the old o nes.

    Anywhere from 24 to 30 inches is reasonable for a single seater. But modifying a Kitfox means you are (probably) not cutting the fuselage and narrowing it... just moving the seat to the center.

    The Sky Raider and Ridge Runner single seaters are essentially de facto Kitfox 1's built to 24 inches, and they apparently work great (I just bought a Ridge Runner myself).
     
  15. Dec 30, 2019 #35

    Wanttaja

    Wanttaja

    Wanttaja

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2013
    Messages:
    1,308
    Likes Received:
    1,514
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    Being of, err, "Grand Size" myself, cockpit room is actually something I pay a lot of attention to. Back about 36 years ago, I was working Boeing's proposal for the original Space Station. As part of it, they asked for volunteers to have their dimensions measured to find 5% female and 95% male examples to use as test subjects in space station design.

    Went to Boeing's Renton plant, where they had a big iron maiden setup (in the medieval, not rock and role sense) that had all these structures to measure various parts of your body and how much range of motion you had.

    I didn't get picked for the test team as too many of my measurements were beyond 95%... in fact, over 99%. Here's the card they gave me:

    http://www.wanttaja.com/anthro.jpg

    [​IMG]

    It went a long way to explain why I had trouble fitting in various airplanes and even cars.

    For a while afterwards, I took a tape measure to every fly-in and (with the owner's permission) made a series of measurements related to cockpit size. You can find my results here:

    http://www.wanttaja.com/avlinks/cockpit.htm

    Didn't record the year of the 172, looks like it might have been important. But I certainly measured more than 36".

    Note that *all* cockpit measurements were made by myself. I had a lot of eager folks (and companies) volunteer their own measurements, but never would be sure if they were done in the same way I did mine.

    Ron Wanttaja
     
  16. Dec 31, 2019 #36

    Daleandee

    Daleandee

    Daleandee

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2015
    Messages:
    912
    Likes Received:
    570
    Location:
    SC
    The aircraft I have now is my second Sonex ... and they both have the center stick option. I generally fly left seat but have at times sat in the center with the stick between my legs and used the outside rudder pedals. Feels quite natural that way, the view is quite good, and it's easier to keep a check on my six.

    I'm not real large (5'9"/185lbs) so I get to fly passengers. I love sharing the joy & beauty of flight! But sharing is a limited time thing in a small cockpit, except for the wife ... she can ride all day if she wants! :D

    In another thread a few years ago I gave some details about my approach to gaining as much room in the cockpit as possible (within reason). Since that time a transponder has found it's way under the panel and there is a spot waiting for a TruTrak Autopilot as soon as those lottery numbers hit:

    Interiors

    Dale
    N319WF
     
  17. Dec 31, 2019 #37

    Mark Z

    Mark Z

    Mark Z

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2012
    Messages:
    555
    Likes Received:
    281
    Location:
    Granbury, Texas USA 0TX0
    I flew a Gulfstream and wondered why the cockpit didn’t have more room.
    Never fast enough either.
     
    mcrae0104 likes this.
  18. Dec 31, 2019 #38

    mcrae0104

    mcrae0104

    mcrae0104

    Armchair Mafia Conspirator HBA Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2009
    Messages:
    3,075
    Likes Received:
    2,096
    Location:
    BDU, BJC
    Nobody paying for a Gulfstream gives two hoots how big the front seat is. The back seats are comfy though.

    IMG_5974.JPG
     
    BJC likes this.

Share This Page



arrow_white