8 cylinder VW?

Homebuilt Aircraft & Kit Plane Forum

Help Support Homebuilt Aircraft & Kit Plane Forum:

dirk_D

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2010
Messages
94
Location
Victoria, Australia.
If you are casting a block why not use a chevy crankshaft and camshaft?
96 to 104mm barrels and a redesigned head for gas flow, you would need 3 patterns, 2 for the case and a universal head.
Fill in the blanks with a mix off VW and chevy derivative parts.

Imagine a set of Edelbrock covers stuck to both sides?
(or weld two cranks and make a 16)
 

Dan Thomas

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2008
Messages
5,936
If you are casting a block why not use a chevy crankshaft and camshaft?
96 to 104mm barrels and a redesigned head for gas flow, you would need 3 patterns, 2 for the case and a universal head.
Fill in the blanks with a mix off VW and chevy derivative parts.

Imagine a set of Edelbrock covers stuck to both sides?
(or weld two cranks and make a 16)
You would have an engine with an odd firing pattern. The Chevy is a 90° engine. Using that crank in an opposed engine changes the piston phasing by 90° overall. The camshaft would not work and you'd need to make one to fit the weird firing sequence, and the ignition would be really difficult to set up. You wouldn't have the normal four firings per rev, spaced 90° apart.

Dan
 
Joined
Mar 10, 2012
Messages
17
Location
no entry
...The 1 engine,1 prop rule covers our Recreational Aviation class, ie, RA.Aus, not GA. Coupling 2 props via belts, chains or shafts is still 2 props. ...I have thought of the contra props and a case could be made to CASA, our Civil Aviation Safety Authority that it was a single 'propulsion system' with better characteristics than a single prop.
so, i guess this aircraft would have been an outlaw?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wright_Flyer

 

dirk_D

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2010
Messages
94
Location
Victoria, Australia.
You would have an engine with an odd firing pattern. The Chevy is a 90° engine. Using that crank in an opposed engine changes the piston phasing by 90° overall. The camshaft would not work and you'd need to make one to fit the weird firing sequence, and the ignition would be really difficult to set up. You wouldn't have the normal four firings per rev, spaced 90° apart.

Dan
You're right Dan, but i was thinking along the along the lines of a Ferrari 512tr, they call these motors 'boxers' when in fact they are a shared journal crankipin. These motors do not have balance shafts, was hoping that the 180 degree line of forces would only leave a mild 2nd or 3rd order vibration. Like a gentle axial rocking motion.

The 16 cyl with the 2 cranks phased 180 degrees would cancel this, this is all dreaming though - i have seen many example of airworthy beechcraft singles in Australia for $40k to $50 and to ignore that and forge ahead with an exhaustive, self funded engine development would mean i would probably never see the skies..

It would be a darn cool engine though!
 

deskpilot

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 30, 2009
Messages
1,131
Location
Morphett Vale, South Australia. Just south of Adel
Hmmmm. Not sure about that one. 2 VW's for sure but like one person questions, what happens if one fails. At least with my set-up, if one fails, you have a total failure and act accordingly. Totally survivable unless you're over tiger country or water. Personally, I don't go over either.
 

dirk_D

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2010
Messages
94
Location
Victoria, Australia.
I would be sitting in a pile of warm brown stuff testing that chopper!

This motor is very do able!

111.8 mm bore spacing small block chevy,
112 mm bore spacing vw beetle 1600.

The 0.2 pitch error could be ironed out with balancing the error to cylinder pairs.
All the parts come of the shelf, 3 casting patterns.
 
Last edited:

dino

Well-Known Member
HBA Supporter
Joined
Sep 18, 2007
Messages
696
Location
florida
Hmmmm. Not sure about that one. 2 VW's for sure but like one person questions, what happens if one fails. At least with my set-up, if one fails, you have a total failure and act accordingly. Totally survivable unless you're over tiger country or water. Personally, I don't go over either.
The VW on a helo can be run at points higher on the power curve than a direct drive prop. This could be enough to give limited single engine capability at the lowest power required point of the chopper.

Dino
 

delta

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 26, 2011
Messages
2,448
Location
Brookside Utah
My best guess is that the transmission has one input from the coupled engines, and that the transmission disengages and freewheels when the drive is not powered.
 
Top