21st century Volksplane?

Discussion in 'Aircraft Design / Aerodynamics / New Technology' started by cluttonfred, May 8, 2011.

Help Support HomeBuiltAirplanes Forum by donating:

  1. Nov 4, 2018 #3301

    gtae07

    gtae07

    gtae07

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2012
    Messages:
    1,802
    Likes Received:
    1,074
    Location:
    Georgia
    Takeoff might be a bit problematic ;)
     
  2. Nov 4, 2018 #3302

    Cy V

    Cy V

    Cy V

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2008
    Messages:
    419
    Likes Received:
    119
    Location:
    Virginia
    When I think of a 21st Volksplane, I envision something like the M19 Flying Squirrel, except in CNC cut wood. It's a good looking plane with nice, simple lines. It uses a VW engine, although another engine could be used instead. Just my $0.02.

    flyingsquirrel2.jpg
     
    Sockmonkey, erkki67 and Aerowerx like this.
  3. Nov 5, 2018 #3303

    Aerowerx

    Aerowerx

    Aerowerx

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2011
    Messages:
    4,975
    Likes Received:
    1,354
    Location:
    Marion, Ohio
    Maybe we should all hide in the closet with a blanket over our heads?

    Oh, wait. Maybe there is a meteor about to crash through the roof.
     
  4. Nov 5, 2018 #3304

    Victor Bravo

    Victor Bravo

    Victor Bravo

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2014
    Messages:
    6,071
    Likes Received:
    4,848
    Location:
    KWHP, Los Angeles CA, USA
    Speaking only for myself, I was responding to postings by Fritz and others where they were apparently under the impression that my previous point was based on the pilot being squished between the spar and the engine... as the fuselage collapsed in a vertical crash or a horizontal impact into a wall, car, etc.

    My previous point was NOT about that scenario.

    My point was about (what I believe is a more common) scenario in which the pilot is injured by a a fencepost, rock, tree stump, berm, rut, etc. that the aircraft is sliding into during a (controlled) emergency off-field landing.

    I realize full well that not every crash scenario is survivable, and this is greatly affected by aircraft mass, velocity, etc. HOWEVER, I believe the record shows that a lot of fatal or serious injury occurs in crashes that are far less than a "vertical plunge into the ground".

    With sincere respects to everyone, having a big heavy part of the airplane (like the wing center section) between the pilot and whatever the aircraft is going to hit, slide over, etc. provides more protection to the pilot than having that heavy/strong structure behind or above the pilot.

    Yes I agree that the relationship between crash safety and aircraft configuration deserves a separate thread.
     
  5. Nov 5, 2018 #3305

    Pops

    Pops

    Pops

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2013
    Messages:
    7,110
    Likes Received:
    6,003
    Location:
    USA.
    I think that the 21st Volkspane should be like the SSSC in surface areas, weight and power, but if you don't like the Piper J-3 Cub looks, it would be easy to change the looks to something more modern, but for me, I love the looks of the airplanes in the 1930's and 1940's. Cheap 1835 cc, 60 hp engine and the construction changed to Fritz's CNC cut, tongue and slot construction . Easy all wood except for the 4130 steel fittings, landing gear, engine mount and streamline alum wing struts.
    wing span -- 30'
    wing area-- 120 sq'
    EW --- 485 lbs
    GW--- 810 lbs
    Fuselage width -- 24" (could easy be 25/26" wide )
     

    Attached Files:

    Cy V and erkki67 like this.
  6. Nov 5, 2018 #3306

    FritzW

    FritzW

    FritzW

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2011
    Messages:
    3,627
    Likes Received:
    3,251
    Location:
    Las Cruces, NM
    ...quick, ....before Matthew shows up and runs us off

    Nobody, ever, said anything about a "vertical plunge into the ground". The discussion is weather or not a shoulder wing, pilot in front of the spar, airplane is any more dangerous than any other airplane. Show me one example in the last 100 years where this wing configuration contributed to a pilot/pax injury. I luvya brother but the windmill your tilting at isn't in the NTSB record. I think your trying to make a tempest out of a bunny fart ;)

    ...gotta run, I think I hear Matthew coming

    EDIT: P.S. I think this post is on topic. The 'Lark' is a solid candidate for a VP-21 but the "chicken little" gang is trying to paint it as a dangerous configuration.
     
  7. Nov 5, 2018 #3307

    Pops

    Pops

    Pops

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2013
    Messages:
    7,110
    Likes Received:
    6,003
    Location:
    USA.
    I really like the Lark. Good enough for me for a VP-21. I wasn't planing on building another homebuilt after finishing the JMR but since I have an engine for the Lark and lots of other material to build one, how could I resist. Its one airplane that would even look good with a nose gear if someone wanted to go in that direction.
    Make it soon, I don't have forever you know :)
     
    flyinut and FritzW like this.
  8. Nov 5, 2018 #3308

    FritzW

    FritzW

    FritzW

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2011
    Messages:
    3,627
    Likes Received:
    3,251
    Location:
    Las Cruces, NM
    We just have to live to be 157 so we can build all the airplanes we want to build :gig:
     
    erkki67 and Pops like this.
  9. Nov 5, 2018 #3309

    Pops

    Pops

    Pops

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2013
    Messages:
    7,110
    Likes Received:
    6,003
    Location:
    USA.
    Well, if I'm going to live that long, think after the VP-21 I'll build another Falconar F-12 then the Bettlemaster, then a Hatz bi-plane, then a ? By that time I'll have a longer list.
     
    erkki67 likes this.
  10. Nov 5, 2018 #3310

    Victor Bravo

    Victor Bravo

    Victor Bravo

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2014
    Messages:
    6,071
    Likes Received:
    4,848
    Location:
    KWHP, Los Angeles CA, USA
    It was this post above that I was referring to, when I mentioned that it was not the idea of the pilot being crushed bwteeen spar and engine that I was thinking about.

    I have never said that shoulder wing airplanes were evil incarnate, or deathtraps, etc. I may actually have more flight time in true shoulder wing airplanes than most of the folks here (see photo below, a head-on view of the type of sailplane I flew in 1984-85). I also have experience hitting stuff on the ground in forced landings in shoulder wing aircraft (see old grainy black and white photo of me below, after ripping the gear out of a Mini-Nimbus glider in a competition in 1983).

    I also disagree that I was pulling horse-s**t out of thin air when I said that having the spar between the pilot and whatever the airplane could hit was a good idea. Respectfully, I have to dig my heels in on this issue: Having the main spar carry-through structure between the pilot's internal organs, spine, etc. and any hard objects on the ground where the airplane may be landing is absolutely safer than not having it there.

    outlandg.gif

    gliders42.jpg
     
  11. Nov 5, 2018 #3311

    lr27

    lr27

    lr27

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2007
    Messages:
    3,216
    Likes Received:
    465
    As long as you don't flip over, of course.
     
  12. Nov 7, 2018 #3312

    Cy V

    Cy V

    Cy V

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2008
    Messages:
    419
    Likes Received:
    119
    Location:
    Virginia
    A lot of the discussion in this thread seems to be on which engine to use. Why not make different variants for different engines? That's what the Mini-Max guys do. They have versions for 2-strokes and versions for VW engines.

    Why not make a version of the 21st Century Volksplane for the VW, one for the O-100, one for the Suzuki, one for the V-Twin, and so forth?

    Is there a reason why there has to be only one engine option?
     
  13. Nov 7, 2018 #3313

    rv7charlie

    rv7charlie

    rv7charlie

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2014
    Messages:
    435
    Likes Received:
    170
    Location:
    Jackson
    No reason it can't use various engines, within common sense limits of weight, HP, required prop diameter, etc. But different variants? After 3,000+ posts, we can't pick *one* 'variant'. :) The Pietenpol flies with everything from Model A Fords to small Continentals to various auto conversions. But the variations are motor mount length and the fact that with it having a parasol wing, the builder can move the wing fore/aft to help get the cg correct for widely varying engine weights. Any low wing or true enclosed cockpit high wing will be trickier.
     
  14. Nov 7, 2018 #3314

    Cy V

    Cy V

    Cy V

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2008
    Messages:
    419
    Likes Received:
    119
    Location:
    Virginia
    Well, that sounds like it would work too. I guess my thinking is: after 3,000+ posts, it's time to pic an engine and go with it. Additional engine options can be added later.
     
  15. Nov 7, 2018 #3315

    BJC

    BJC

    BJC

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2013
    Messages:
    9,512
    Likes Received:
    6,289
    Location:
    97FL, Florida, USA
    Well, if it is going to be a VP ......


    BJC
     
  16. Nov 7, 2018 #3316

    Hot Wings

    Hot Wings

    Hot Wings

    Well-Known Member HBA Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    6,352
    Likes Received:
    2,282
    Location:
    Rocky Mountains
    Virtual Power? :whistle:
     
    BJC likes this.
  17. Nov 7, 2018 #3317

    Pops

    Pops

    Pops

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2013
    Messages:
    7,110
    Likes Received:
    6,003
    Location:
    USA.
    I put my vote in for the 1835 cc, 60 hp VW engine. Most bang for the buck and the most reliable for the HP.
     
  18. Nov 7, 2018 #3318

    BBerson

    BBerson

    BBerson

    Well-Known Member HBA Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2007
    Messages:
    12,007
    Likes Received:
    2,332
    Location:
    Port Townsend WA
    I don't think it's about picking any particular engine, but rather listing all the current engines and new airframe methods that are available either now or near future that offer the same VP-1 mission of simple and low cost.
    Nobody knows what design or designs will be the "Volksplane" of the future till about 10 years afterward.
     
  19. Nov 8, 2018 #3319

    lr27

    lr27

    lr27

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2007
    Messages:
    3,216
    Likes Received:
    465
    The ease of digging up alternate designs on the internet may preclude a successor to the Volksplane.
     
  20. Nov 8, 2018 #3320

    mcrae0104

    mcrae0104

    mcrae0104

    Armchair Mafia Conspirator HBA Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2009
    Messages:
    2,975
    Likes Received:
    1,967
    Location:
    BDU, BJC
    Volvo.
     

Share This Page

arrow_white