• Welcome aboard HomebuiltAirplanes.com, your destination for connecting with a thriving community of more than 10,000 active members, all passionate about home-built aviation. Dive into our comprehensive repository of knowledge, exchange technical insights, arrange get-togethers, and trade aircrafts/parts with like-minded enthusiasts. Unearth a wide-ranging collection of general and kit plane aviation subjects, enriched with engaging imagery, in-depth technical manuals, and rare archives.

    For a nominal fee of $99.99/year or $12.99/month, you can immerse yourself in this dynamic community and unparalleled treasure-trove of aviation knowledge.

    Embark on your journey now!

    Click Here to Become a Premium Member and Experience Homebuilt Airplanes to the Fullest!

1-Up Concept Design

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

DaveD

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 28, 2010
Messages
375
Location
Perth, Western Australia
Life's been getting in the way for the last few years which has slowed work on my Project-Ex idea to less than a crawl... but the dream of a composite pusher has still been bubbling away.
After some napkin doodling I've been toying with the idea of a single seat, mostly Carbon Fibre craft that will meet the Australian 95.10 category (Single seat, <30km/m2 wing loading, 320kg MTOW - with chute and 90kg pilot). I'm sure it's do-able, although a Rotax 582 may be a bit optimistic from a weight point of view.

I've got a few areas I'd like to "think out loud" with all you knowledgeable folks:
1) What's the best way to break this down into sub-assemblies. It's composite, so hard points and mechanical fastenings are bad, but my build space is limited to a double garage sized shed and I want it to be trailerable. My main sticking points are the attachment of the booms to the wing centre section, and the fuselage pod to the wing
2) Fuel in the wing roots or a separate tank low behind the pilot
3) Horizontal tail secondary bonded to the booms, or rotatable for trim, or all flying

Probably the most controversial is the configuration itself. I do understand that history heavily suggest tractors are better, and if you have to go pusher, a single tail boom will be lighter. But at the end of the day this is a one-off vanity project! I am willing to sacrifice some lightness and performance for the twin boom pusher config... this is a hobby not a business and the usual destination when I fly is the same airstrip I took off from!

With that said... let the discussion begin:
1670390608123.png
 
Back
Top