• Welcome aboard HomebuiltAirplanes.com, your destination for connecting with a thriving community of more than 10,000 active members, all passionate about home-built aviation. Dive into our comprehensive repository of knowledge, exchange technical insights, arrange get-togethers, and trade aircrafts/parts with like-minded enthusiasts. Unearth a wide-ranging collection of general and kit plane aviation subjects, enriched with engaging imagery, in-depth technical manuals, and rare archives.

    For a nominal fee of $99.99/year or $12.99/month, you can immerse yourself in this dynamic community and unparalleled treasure-trove of aviation knowledge.

    Embark on your journey now!

    Click Here to Become a Premium Member and Experience Homebuilt Airplanes to the Fullest!

Prandtl lift distribution for conventional configurations?

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

peter hudson

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 24, 2020
Messages
272
Hi All,

So after Prandtl convinced the world that elliptical lift distribution was the most efficient for a given span, he went on to explore his "bell shaped distribution" as the most efficient if structural weight is the fixed parameter. The flying wing guys (Horton and his fans like Al Bowers) jumped on board as it also could solve the adverse yaw problems with flying wings.

So here's my question: Since Part 103 ultralights are restricted in weight, and not span, it would seem logical that they employ the Prandtl lift distribution even in conventional configurations. And they may further benefit from a reduced need for vertical tail volume. Are there any examples out there that tried it?

-Peter-
 
Back
Top