• Welcome aboard HomebuiltAirplanes.com, your destination for connecting with a thriving community of more than 10,000 active members, all passionate about home-built aviation. Dive into our comprehensive repository of knowledge, exchange technical insights, arrange get-togethers, and trade aircrafts/parts with like-minded enthusiasts. Unearth a wide-ranging collection of general and kit plane aviation subjects, enriched with engaging imagery, in-depth technical manuals, and rare archives.

    For a nominal fee of $99.99/year or $12.99/month, you can immerse yourself in this dynamic community and unparalleled treasure-trove of aviation knowledge.

    Embark on your journey now!

    Click Here to Become a Premium Member and Experience Homebuilt Airplanes to the Fullest!

Determining Loading Points on a Tube Structure

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Chris In Marshfield

Well-Known Member
Staff member
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 29, 2008
Messages
1,704
Location
Northwest WI USA
Hi everyone,

Thanks to the great advice I've received and references referred, I've got copies of Bruhn and Peery at my finger tips. Today I read through "Chapter 10: External Loads on the Airplane" of Peery, as well as "Chapter D2: The Loads on the Body" of Bruhn. I'm getting a good feeling for how we determine loads on the fuselage.

In addition, I watched the six-video set of "How To Solve a Truss" that someone else suggested:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p9CMc3FaYVs

So between those two, I'm feeling pretty good about getting a running start at the tube fuselage of an existing proven design, doing the geometries on it, and then bouncing those against the chosen materials to see how someone who has been designing airplanes for a long time chooses the tubing sizes he does for his design.

Bruhn has really nice examples of doing a weight analysis, and picking out the heaviest parts and their locations to determine forces on the fuse. But I'm still trying to wrap my head around the typical load points and how/why they're selected. So, in no particular order:

  1. For a typical "GA" plane in the 2500-pound range, are the greatest forces typically experienced in flight, or stationary on the ground? I get this feeling of neutrality while the plane is flying, but I know that's not right. The weight of the structure is being supported by the wings and tail (although opposite forces). So the weight minus wings being suspended, versus propped up by the gear on the ground. So I see that as a "pressure point" to be measured.
  2. On the ground, I presume we're measuring from the gear attachment and tailwheel as the points of reference? Of course there are weights in the middle to deal with, as Bruhn points out. Things like anticipated passenger weights, cargo, etc.
  3. I read that we must plan for the worst-case scenario: the less-then-perfect landing. Can't remember if that was Peery or Bruhn, but either way it has to be done. I know some of my landings haven't been the best, but I don't know that I've made any 4.5g landings, either. The 4.5g typical limit is for Utility Category planes, if memory serves. But I believe this is for in-flight structural integrity. Do we need to account for 4.5g landings, or are even the hardest landings less than that? I've never felt like I weighed 800 pounds during a landing, so this may not be typical.
I'll not worry about landing gear right now. Just trying to get a feel for fuselage sizing with a proven design.

Many thanks for your insight!
~Chris
 
Back
Top