• Welcome aboard HomebuiltAirplanes.com, your destination for connecting with a thriving community of more than 10,000 active members, all passionate about home-built aviation. Dive into our comprehensive repository of knowledge, exchange technical insights, arrange get-togethers, and trade aircrafts/parts with like-minded enthusiasts. Unearth a wide-ranging collection of general and kit plane aviation subjects, enriched with engaging imagery, in-depth technical manuals, and rare archives.

    For a nominal fee of $99.99/year or $12.99/month, you can immerse yourself in this dynamic community and unparalleled treasure-trove of aviation knowledge.

    Embark on your journey now!

    Click Here to Become a Premium Member and Experience Homebuilt Airplanes to the Fullest!

NACA 65-215-415 vs Ribblett equivalent?

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Will Aldridge

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 30, 2009
Messages
997
Location
Northern Utah
I have read quite a few posts about Ribbletts book and his version of the the NACA airfoils.

My design uses the 65-215-415 airfoil. I picked it because it has a reasonable clmax (1.6) and fairly benign stall characteristics, as well as the max thickness fairly far aft. Even though the airfoil has a pretty good reputation on the Piper Cherokee the thought keeps surfacing in the back of my mind that maybe I better take a closer look at Ribbletts version. I don't even know the name for it so I would be obliged if someone could tell me what it is.

I would also appreciate it if someone could post some of the basic numbers for section such as cl max and so forth. If there is a substantial increase in performance I will probably buy the book so I can get the coordinates and use it in my design. If however there doesn't appear to be any (or negligible) benefit I will probably hold off.

Opinions welcome.
 
Back
Top