• Welcome aboard HomebuiltAirplanes.com, your destination for connecting with a thriving community of more than 10,000 active members, all passionate about home-built aviation. Dive into our comprehensive repository of knowledge, exchange technical insights, arrange get-togethers, and trade aircrafts/parts with like-minded enthusiasts. Unearth a wide-ranging collection of general and kit plane aviation subjects, enriched with engaging imagery, in-depth technical manuals, and rare archives.

    For a nominal fee of $99.99/year or $12.99/month, you can immerse yourself in this dynamic community and unparalleled treasure-trove of aviation knowledge.

    Embark on your journey now!

    Click Here to Become a Premium Member and Experience Homebuilt Airplanes to the Fullest!

Another engine theory Q - Blowers?

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Aviacs

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 16, 2019
Messages
912
I'm aware of the energy value (efficiencies) of turbo prop systems. Especially for normalize HP maintenance high up.
This Q is not about that. :)

When converting small auto engines, we all tend to need high torque at lower rpm than original design rpm's for optimal HP range & peak torque in the original engine.

PSRU's are a common solution.
Especially if we hope for higher speeds yet good take-off and climb performance with longer props than the un-aided engine can swing.

So: now that small (relatively light) roots blowers are available somewhat economically,
Which is "harder" on a 4 stroke IC engine -
1.) gain HP & convert to torque by running the engine fast and reducing the output rpm with a PSRU?
or
2.) install a blower and run the engine at same rpm as above PSRU output, but with more available torque (More HP at same rpm)?

Both add heat to the base engine which has to be rejected.
Which system is theoretically (practical problems can be solved) "worse"?

smt
 
Back
Top