• Welcome aboard HomebuiltAirplanes.com, your destination for connecting with a thriving community of more than 10,000 active members, all passionate about home-built aviation. Dive into our comprehensive repository of knowledge, exchange technical insights, arrange get-togethers, and trade aircrafts/parts with like-minded enthusiasts. Unearth a wide-ranging collection of general and kit plane aviation subjects, enriched with engaging imagery, in-depth technical manuals, and rare archives.

    For a nominal fee of $99.99/year or $12.99/month, you can immerse yourself in this dynamic community and unparalleled treasure-trove of aviation knowledge.

    Embark on your journey now!

    Click Here to Become a Premium Member and Experience Homebuilt Airplanes to the Fullest!

Theoretical question about wing thickness

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

geosnooker2000

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2019
Messages
196
Location
Somerville, TN
Using the Zenair CH 640 as an example, Mr. Chris Heintz claims "I guess fat wings are one of my trademarks. The depth lets me build a strong wing that is very light, and gives excellent stall characteristics as well. Under 200 mph, the thickness doesn't contribute to significant drag, so why not use it for its other advantages?"

This is a question about the effects of thinning the design of the wing.

I am assuming that would result in less drag and a faster stall speed? The stall would be more abrupt?

I know that going with a different airfoil design would have an effect, but for now, let's assume the same camber and generally the same airfoil design, just slimmer.
 
Back
Top