• Welcome aboard HomebuiltAirplanes.com, your destination for connecting with a thriving community of more than 10,000 active members, all passionate about home-built aviation. Dive into our comprehensive repository of knowledge, exchange technical insights, arrange get-togethers, and trade aircrafts/parts with like-minded enthusiasts. Unearth a wide-ranging collection of general and kit plane aviation subjects, enriched with engaging imagery, in-depth technical manuals, and rare archives.

    For a nominal fee of $99.99/year or $12.99/month, you can immerse yourself in this dynamic community and unparalleled treasure-trove of aviation knowledge.

    Embark on your journey now!

    Click Here to Become a Premium Member and Experience Homebuilt Airplanes to the Fullest!

Fly by wire and control laws for EAB FBW

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Joined
Nov 14, 2009
Messages
9,965
Location
Rocky Mountains
Been thinking about this again and haven't seen this topic come up in a while so......

For the purposes of this thread lets define fly-by-wire as a system that may or may not respond by moving the control surfaces directly proportional to the pilots inputs.

Lets further agree, for the purposes of this thread, that we have developed the method and materials to build a man rated control system that has no direct mechanical linkage to the pilot's input devices (stick, rudder pedals and throttle) that is both reliable and redundant and is equivalent to the existing mechanical system with regard to cost and weight. In other words we have a proven servo actuated control system that responds to the pilot exactly as a mechanical control system would.


Taking this system to the next level and inserting software between the pilot and the control surfaces/throttle just how should this be implemented to be of the most benefit to the average EAB pilot - if there is such a thing. Some things like stall prevention, over speed, over "G" prevention and autopilot integration are fairly obvious. What other features such as dutch roll damping, spiral prevention, and maybe even going so far as adding artificial stability should be incorporated?

Opinions, observations, and ideas...............???
 
Back
Top