Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 31 to 38 of 38

Thread: Relative safety of various construction materials

  1. #31
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,075
    Likes (Given)
    2
    Likes (Received)
    29

    Re: Relative safety of various construction materials

    Additional safety issues:
    -wood: severed appendages, damage to lungs when not wearing !@#$%% dust mask while sanding
    -welded: burns,
    -sheet metal: cuts, severed or crushed appendages, probably other stuff (I actually met someone who lost most of a finger on the sharp edge of a B-29 bomb bay door he was carrying)
    -composites: allergies, other toxicity, lung damage Ever see what happens on a hot day if you don't spread out your epoxy in time?

    all: eye damage from flying fragments, ear damage if you get lazy about earplugs, chemical toxicity, asphyxiation if careless and spraying paint inside, fire and explosion from volatile liquids near pilot lights and sparks, making holes in yourself by doing dumb things with tools, getting your clothing caught in rotating machinery

    With flammables about, maybe we should all have wood or other static dissipative floors, slightly conductive shoes, big fire extinguishers, etc. They make floor wax that will help with this, also shoe straps, though maybe that's going too far.

    Probably lots of other things too. Obviously I don't know what the rates are, but my point is that safety while building is part of the picture as well. The issues involved depend somewhat on the material you pick, and a lot on how you approach your work.
    -----------------
    I'm not yet a full scale pilot, but, in the absence of extensive training, I suspect that simple, relatively slow aircraft are safer.

  2. #32
    Registered User BJC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    97FL, Florida, USA
    Posts
    4,916
    Likes (Given)
    2551
    Likes (Received)
    3097

    Re: Relative safety of various construction materials

    Just about any activity has associated hazards. The key to safety is to understand the hazards, understand how to mitigate / manage them, and fatithfully doing so. Flying isn't dangerous, but crashing is, and anything that can get you up into the air can also kill you. There is so much more to flying than just getting off the ground; I encourage you to get a pilot's license, and fly enough to discover the type of flying that you really want to do before focusing too much on a particular design. There are lots of posts here about this topic.


    BJC

  3. Likes Little Scrapper liked this post
  4. #33
    Registered User ToddK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    Humble
    Posts
    38
    Likes (Given)
    14
    Likes (Received)
    8

    Re: Relative safety of various construction materials

    If crash survival is a top priority, then the safest building material might be whatever is attached to a BRS.

  5. Likes cheapracer liked this post
  6. #34
    Registered User BJC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    97FL, Florida, USA
    Posts
    4,916
    Likes (Given)
    2551
    Likes (Received)
    3097

    Re: Relative safety of various construction materials

    Quote Originally Posted by ToddK View Post
    If crash survival is a top priority, then the safest building material might be whatever is attached to a BRS.

    Not really. http://airfactsjournal.com/2012/05/d...cirrus-pilots/


    BJC

  7. #35
    Registered User Little Scrapper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    2,150
    Likes (Given)
    1401
    Likes (Received)
    1063

    Re: Relative safety of various construction materials

    BJC is correct, go fly some stuff, visit shows, do some thinking etc. Fortunately there's a lot of great options.

    Hopefully you man up and go tube and fabric. Lol. Kidding, well, sort of. Haha.

  8. #36
    Registered User ToddK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    Humble
    Posts
    38
    Likes (Given)
    14
    Likes (Received)
    8

    Re: Relative safety of various construction materials

    Quote Originally Posted by BJC View Post
    I did not read anything in the linked article where a correctly deployed BRS failed to save lives.

    From Wikipedia:

    As of 15 August 2016, the CAPS has been activated 83 times, 69 of which saw successful parachute deployment. In those successful deployments, there were 142 survivors and 1 fatality. No fatalities, unsuccessful deployments, or anomalies (with the exception of one that is still under investigation) have occurred when the parachute was deployed within the certified speed and altitude parameters. Some additional deployments have been reported by accident, as caused by ground impact or post-impact fires, and 14 of the aircraft involved in CAPS deployments have been repaired and put back into service.[24]

    Post 2011, the year of their highest fatality rate to date, Cirrus has experienced an increase in CAPS deployments coinciding with a steady decrease in fatal accidents, giving them one of the best safety records in the industry and less than half the industry average. This was attributed to a new approach to training, particularly in when to deploy the parachute system

  9. #37
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Memphis, TN
    Posts
    7,273
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1691

    Re: Relative safety of various construction materials

    Cirrus has had to advertise to the owners "Pull early; Pull often" to get you to use it . Insurance does not want you flying a Cirrus in dead stick. They might not even pay off a claim if it could have been pulled. The problem with Cirrus has always been people being able to out buy their skill. It is an unforgiving airplane if mishandled by a C150 pilot; once upset it is a little more demanding than a Bonanza with the same number of seats. If you fly it like a baby airliner you will be fine. A friend has a Cirrus and he is cutting a hole in the side of his RV8 for a chute. He believes in it, although he wants to be the first on the block with one in a RV8. I hate watching him cut up a perfect airplane to do it. He should have built another with it integral.

  10. #38
    Registered User BJC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    97FL, Florida, USA
    Posts
    4,916
    Likes (Given)
    2551
    Likes (Received)
    3097

    Re: Relative safety of various construction materials

    Quote Originally Posted by ToddK View Post
    If crash survival is a top priority, then the safest building material might be whatever is attached to a BRS.
    Quote Originally Posted by ToddK View Post
    I did not read anything in the linked article where a correctly deployed BRS failed to save lives.

    From Wikipedia:

    As of 15 August 2016, the CAPS has been activated 83 times, 69 of which saw successful parachute deployment. In those successful deployments, there were 142 survivors and 1 fatality. No fatalities, unsuccessful deployments, or anomalies (with the exception of one that is still under investigation) have occurred when the parachute was deployed within the certified speed and altitude parameters. Some additional deployments have been reported by accident, as caused by ground impact or post-impact fires, and 14 of the aircraft involved in CAPS deployments have been repaired and put back into service.[24]

    Post 2011, the year of their highest fatality rate to date, Cirrus has experienced an increase in CAPS deployments coinciding with a steady decrease in fatal accidents, giving them one of the best safety records in the industry and less than half the industry average. This was attributed to a new approach to training, particularly in when to deploy the parachute system
    I mis-read your first post, above, as "If survival is a top priority ..." My comment was about fatality rates in an aircraft with a BRS, not how many people survive the use of the BRS.

    Pilot judgement and piloting skills, gained through quality training and continual practice, are the key factors is staying alive in an airworthy airplane. Relying on an "easy" button is not a good plan.


    BJC

  11. Likes ToddK, Topaz liked this post

Similar Threads

  1. Cassutt - Construction Techniques & Standards / Tube and Fabric Aircraft Construction
    By Little Scrapper in forum General Experimental Aviation Questions
    Replies: 220
    Last Post: December 27th, 2016, 04:57 PM
  2. Locating the C.G. relative to wing aeroydnamic center?
    By WK95 in forum Aircraft Design / Aerodynamics / New Technology
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: April 10th, 2016, 08:32 AM
  3. Engine vs pliot placement relative to neutral pt
    By stankap in forum Aircraft Design / Aerodynamics / New Technology
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: February 6th, 2012, 06:03 PM
  4. RELATIVE HUMIDITY
    By TWOLABS in forum Wood Construction
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: October 2nd, 2008, 08:51 PM
  5. PLUG CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS
    By AVI in forum Composites
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: October 6th, 2004, 08:53 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •