• Welcome aboard HomebuiltAirplanes.com, your destination for connecting with a thriving community of more than 10,000 active members, all passionate about home-built aviation. Dive into our comprehensive repository of knowledge, exchange technical insights, arrange get-togethers, and trade aircrafts/parts with like-minded enthusiasts. Unearth a wide-ranging collection of general and kit plane aviation subjects, enriched with engaging imagery, in-depth technical manuals, and rare archives.

    For a nominal fee of $99.99/year or $12.99/month, you can immerse yourself in this dynamic community and unparalleled treasure-trove of aviation knowledge.

    Embark on your journey now!

    Click Here to Become a Premium Member and Experience Homebuilt Airplanes to the Fullest!

Same Design - Different Materials

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Joel Shoshone

Member
Joined
Apr 3, 2006
Messages
10
Location
Spokane, Washington
I'm not an aeronautical engineer, but I think about airplane design all the time. I look at designs and admire their forms and the functions that they produce.

Is there any significant history of experimental builders taking a successful design, be it wood, metal, rag and tube or composite construction, and building the same aerodynamic package in a different material?

If one considered overall weight, weight distribution, center of gravity, strength of materials, strength of assemblies, deflection and maybe a few other variables, could you still get into trouble?

I'm a long way from ever trying something like this, but I'm curious what some of the very knowledgable designers will have to say.

Thanks.
 
Back
Top