• Welcome aboard HomebuiltAirplanes.com, your destination for connecting with a thriving community of more than 10,000 active members, all passionate about home-built aviation. Dive into our comprehensive repository of knowledge, exchange technical insights, arrange get-togethers, and trade aircrafts/parts with like-minded enthusiasts. Unearth a wide-ranging collection of general and kit plane aviation subjects, enriched with engaging imagery, in-depth technical manuals, and rare archives.

    For a nominal fee of $99.99/year or $12.99/month, you can immerse yourself in this dynamic community and unparalleled treasure-trove of aviation knowledge.

    Embark on your journey now!

    Click Here to Become a Premium Member and Experience Homebuilt Airplanes to the Fullest!

Stability requirements for automatic control and navigation UAV

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Pierre1

Active Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2015
Messages
38
Location
Paris
FAA gives stability standards for GA flying quality. For both fully automatic airplanes and autopilot aiding stabilized (sometimes called ‘half automatic’) manual control airplanes, as the autopilot can reflect much faster and more accurately than human pilots, the stability requirement standards for these airplanes shall be less strict.

I’m wondering,

  1. Is there anyway, even a rough way, to help figure out how much less stable could the fully/half automatic airplanes be? People would need a stability design standards when they design fully/half automatic airplanes as well.
  2. For fully/half automatic control and navigation airplanes design, is there still a need to take dynamic stability into account? It seems that as the airplane control surfaces are kept moving very frequently by the autopilot, the airplane attitude is adjusted all the time so there’s no need of the dynamic stability any more.
 
Back
Top