• Welcome aboard HomebuiltAirplanes.com, your destination for connecting with a thriving community of more than 10,000 active members, all passionate about home-built aviation. Dive into our comprehensive repository of knowledge, exchange technical insights, arrange get-togethers, and trade aircrafts/parts with like-minded enthusiasts. Unearth a wide-ranging collection of general and kit plane aviation subjects, enriched with engaging imagery, in-depth technical manuals, and rare archives.

    For a nominal fee of $99.99/year or $12.99/month, you can immerse yourself in this dynamic community and unparalleled treasure-trove of aviation knowledge.

    Embark on your journey now!

    Click Here to Become a Premium Member and Experience Homebuilt Airplanes to the Fullest!

MH170 and aircraft tracking on oceanatic flights

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Geek1945

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2013
Messages
144
Location
Erath County TX 76462
As a radar repairman in the 1960's we all knew tracking over water is a hit and miss affair. Water vapor and air temperatures frequently did weird things to the radar pulses, ditto for shortwave radio. I'm totally confounded that commercial aircraft engines/aircraft systems are monitored via satellite and the planes location is not. Just visit any major trucking or shipping business and ask where your shipment is then look at a map on a PC screen and see you’re package on an aircraft or truck moving on some airway or highway. It would appear aircraft engine/plane OEM's are more worried about lawsuits over their hardware than if those passengers are lost somewhere. Of course we'll spend $10 to 6th power searching rather than eliminating this problem, amazing. It seems if a cell phone can be tracked why not a commercial airliner, after all hasn't this happen before? Isn't stupidity defined as repeating the same mistake over and over? Ed
 
Back
Top