• Welcome aboard HomebuiltAirplanes.com, your destination for connecting with a thriving community of more than 10,000 active members, all passionate about home-built aviation. Dive into our comprehensive repository of knowledge, exchange technical insights, arrange get-togethers, and trade aircrafts/parts with like-minded enthusiasts. Unearth a wide-ranging collection of general and kit plane aviation subjects, enriched with engaging imagery, in-depth technical manuals, and rare archives.

    For a nominal fee of $99.99/year or $12.99/month, you can immerse yourself in this dynamic community and unparalleled treasure-trove of aviation knowledge.

    Embark on your journey now!

    Click Here to Become a Premium Member and Experience Homebuilt Airplanes to the Fullest!

Why do helicopters don´t use optional detachable wings to increase range?

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

oriol

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2009
Messages
1,488
Location
Barcelona, Spain.
Hi all!



I just happen to learn how the old MIL MI 6 improved his speed performances (I guess it also improved its available range, fuel consumption...) by fitting optionally some wings.

mil_mi_6_hook-45981.jpgmilmi6.jpgmil-mi6-hook_6.jpgriga-mil-mi-6-hook-01.jpg


Apparently the helicoptered was so heavy that the engineers decided to put some wings to bear part of the lift away from the rotor.


Mil Mi-6 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Empty weight: 27,240 kg (60,055 lb)
Max take off weight: 42,500 kg (93,700 lb)
Max speed: 300 km/h (162 kt)
Cruise 250Km/h (135 KN)


Since the Mil MI 6 no other helicopter has used fixed/detachable wings to increase its performances.
Why?

Does the interaction of the rotor wake reduces significantly the lift generated by the wing?
If so why did it worked fine with the Mil MI 6?



Many thanks for your interesting answers!



Oriol
 
Back
Top