| Home | ![]() | Search the forums : |
![]() |
Re: 2.0 Ecotec 260HP Those are really two different things - water methanol injection by itself does little; its only purpose is to control detonation coupled with extremely high boost pressure. Unless your blower is capable of producing such pressures, it won't increase your power on its own. Nitrous, however will boost power whether the engine is supercharged or not. "Aeronautical engineering is highly educated guessing, worked out to five decimal places." |
Re: 2.0 Ecotec 260HP Quote:
However if you over boost your ADI system you will find out that you can increase your compression ratio effectively increasing your HP and TQ through the band. This coupled with a large tank will allow you to run waterinjection non stop for racing applications. water/meth injection increases the compression ratio in the cylinder and the methanol is alcohol, when injected the water raises compression for more power, and the methanol is what they use in alcohol racing, that is why alcohol engines run 12:1. The water is turned to steam by the sheer head put off by the manifold which when it is compressed it is less compressible then air, which helps add room/volume to the cylinder, so on the compression stroke it causes a higher cylinder psi, typically about 10-20psi over the stock compression. Alot of piston fighters used water/meth injection to add 500-1,200 horsepower to their engines, they couldn't use it for long though because after your ran the injection you literally had to rebuold the engine. butthat is because they would turn the Merlin for example from a 1,500HP to a 2,200+HP engine. Many racing diesels use water/meth injection. Simply because Diesels run better with higher compression, and water helps keep your EGT"s down. |
Re: 2.0 Ecotec 260HP Quote:
Hm I hadn't heard of that effect before, I'll have to do some reading on that. Any one else have any experience with the theory of water methanol injection? "Aeronautical engineering is highly educated guessing, worked out to five decimal places." |
Re: 2.0 Ecotec 260HP Quote:
here is some reading... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_injection_(engines) http://www.snowperformance.net/produ...cle-pdf-42.pdf Water/Methanol Injection on 6.7 Cummins Rolls-Royce Merlin/V1650 Engine |
Re: 2.0 Ecotec 260HP Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Its simple... water/meth injection allows you to run more timing, boost, and/or compression. By itself it does not increase horsepower. |
Re: 2.0 Ecotec 260HP
I was not clear before on the process of how W/m works, and i used alot of shortcuts because i was lazy and didn't want to go in great detail, i'll admit that. And so i'm going to explain it in greater detail now. Yes, the water when injected into the engine will cool down the air molecules which increases the psi of the air, water meth effective raises the compression of the engine. There are four major ways to raise the compression in an engine. 1. Increase air/fuel mixture normal engines run 12.5:1, leaning our your mix to say 13:1 will decrease HP but help burn your fuel more thoroughly, increasing your fuel air mixture increases in more HP, however you run the risk of melting cylinder and heads doing this, typically this happens once you hit 10:1. Thus this method is not as safe. 2. increase compression. Lets take a 454cid engine. 4 inch bore and 4.52 inch stroke, we will use 5,000RPM as redline So then well run for the compression 7:1 compression will yeild 289 HP 8:1 compression will yeild 331 HP 9:1 compression will yeild 372 HP 10:1 compression will yeild 413 HP Thus we can see that increasing Compression will increase HP. 3. Water/methanol injection If we added water/meth injection we would see a 15-18% increase in those numbers, why? because it increases HP by increasing the compression through the cooling effects, and the unused steam takes up additional room in the combustion chamber. Some 6.4L Diesels can see as much as 70HP out of w/m injection alone. 4. NOS injection NOS injection increases the fuel air mixture by cooling the incoming air(increasing the PSI and this the dynamic compression) and then the NOS being flammable also acts in the same form as methanol. Hence why i said water/meth injection increases HP. Quote:
Water injection is a method of charge cooling. The first benefit of water injection is intake air charge cooling. By cooling the intake air, more oxygen molecules enter the cylinder through a denser air charge. More oxygen can help to feed the combustion process resulting in a more complete fuel burn. When the water particles enter the hot cylinder during intake, they absorb heat and convert to stream. The added mass to the combustion process helps to extend the downward force on the piston during the power stroke of the motor. The result is more torque produced by the motor similar to older steam engines. Methanol is hygroscopic which means it bonds with water, most guys i know run the premix windshield washer fluid because it comes premixed 50:50. The fact that it is hygroscopic means that the methanol goes into the combustion chamber with the water, the increase compression splits the methanol from the water, and the methanol then vaporizes. Once this happens the methanol and the water then increase the compression of the piston, the methanol then ignites with the fuel allowing for a more thorough burn. In addition to increased dynamic compression this also allows the engine to produce more hp. While i said steam i should have clarified that water still stays in a steam state which enters the combustion chamber as steam, this does have a compression effect. Water/meth does increase HP. Quote:
Supercharged engines like the Merlins don't have wastegates, they are fixed to their boost levels. Thus when WEP was kicked in it over boosted the engine by increasing the water/meth mixture and thus increasing the boost beyond safe levels, this could only be effective for maybe 3-5 mins depending. After the engine was throw into WEP the throttle couldn't be pulled back, it was instead locked until the plane was landing, this was done because the piston rings were normally scorched and had a hard time sealing the combustion chamber, depending on how bad the w/m was could have serious blow by from the piston rings and the valves, this was because the water/meth injection would cause extreme stress into the system. Often time they most the pilot would do is drop to a lower boost setting and limp home afterwards. W/M was necessary to produce the over boosting effect to generate the WEP HP. it had nothing to do with making it live. W/M like NOS causes sever engine pressures on the crank, connecting rods, and the wrist pins and just about everything, if you over boost to much you can kill your engine with W/M and or NOS, neither are safe when overboosting beyone the capabilites that your engine can handle. Here is a link. War emergency power - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Quote:
(FYI the Germans used W/M and nitrous injection first to its greatest extent) Quote:
Quote:
The W/M doesn't give you more room to add boost, it frees up boost similarly to adding a bigger air intake on a engine to free up locked up HP. But yes you are right by its self its effect on HP are minimal, but its effects on the whole system is what counts. Yes water/meth increases HP, it does this just like Nos injection does as well. The Germans used Nitrous oxide or Nos injection if you want to read on that look up GM1. N0S was first used by the Germans in WW2 to aid in the use of their DIESEL powered fighters. the N0s allowed for WEP power for aigh altitude aircraft, it was first used in 1940. It only lasted for about 5 mins. I think i copied the German part from the winki site as well.
Last edited by pepsi71ocean; June 26th, 2009 at 11:54 PM..
|
Re: 2.0 Ecotec 260HP
I dont even know where to begin... You are not raising the compression with methanol. Period. What you are doing in cooling the air and thus its density. This increases the Volumetric Efficiency. More VE means more torque, which increases the HP. Its simple. Quote:
Even if you run a 'set boost' with a locked wastegate, DV, or whatever, you are not being boosted by the simple injection of methanol. What you are doing is exactly the same as above, cooling the air/fuel charge, increasing VE. If that injection is ahead of the turbo/charger, then you are cooling the air charge being compressed, thus getting cooler compressed air to the engine, which has the effect of increasing the boost, ie; the compressor is still boosting, say from 10psi to 25psi, but because the air started out cooler, it exits the compressor cooler, has less loss due to heat, and reaches the throttle at a higher PSI than it normally would. (did that make sense?) The same effect can be done after the compressor, and in fact is - its called an intercooler. All this has to do with cooling the inlet air/fuel charge and raising the VE to increase power. The Merlin needed to be inspected because it was already running on the ragged edge, and the increased power hurt the bearings and rods. I believe you are really confused about water injection, boost, and VE... |
Re: 2.0 Ecotec 260HP Quote:
Yeah, but these things sell so well on e-bay, along with computer cooling fans sold as "electric superchargers".... "Aeronautical engineering is highly educated guessing, worked out to five decimal places." |
Re: 2.0 Ecotec 260HP
More... Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Sorry I missed that before. |
Re: 2.0 Ecotec 260HP
Thread drift! Horsepower is about moving air and fuel and burning it. If an engine is designed and built to run at higher pressures, you can move more air and do it reliably. To move more air, you can make the combustion chamber bigger or you can pressurize the manifold, and you can get even more air in if you cool the air after compressing it. And that is all that ECOTEC engines do. Reliability is largely a matter of making parts beefy enough and out of suitable materials. The problem with getting big power out of a big block V-8 is that the engine was never designed for long life at 1 hp per cubic inch, nor was the block or crankshaft designed to run at big rpm. Now, folks have found a little room for beefier cranks and beefed up the blocks and heads, have found room in that pattern for bunches more power, but they are still trying to fit 10 pounds into an 8 pound bag... Ford has introduced EcoBoost engines, which were intended to either maintain big engine performance with better fuel economy or maintain fuel economy but give you a hot rod... They are direct fuel injected and turbocharged. Because of the direct injection, they can run even higher boost without detonation, pre-ignition, etc. Neat stuff. They produced even more power than the ECOTEC engines at 2.0L. They ran huge duration at high power on our dynos, which is more than I could say about old school big blocks and Navistar's recent diesels. I believe the ECOTEC can do what they say. And it looks like it could be a suitable engine. Once someone is flying them for a while, we will know a lot more about them... Billski |
Re: 2.0 Ecotec 260HP Quote:
That was part of a series, you can increse the HP by increasing the static compression of a engine. Those were taking using a .85(i believe) vE. I can post the mathmatical formulas if you want. Quote:
And example from my notes on the Merlin in hydroplane racing. This is a quote from a guy who i talked to at lenght about the Merlin and its ADI system. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Well Reliability is a mixture of performance and sustainability. You can have either or but not both. Quote:
If you ran low compression pistons(7:1), a longer stroke and a huge rod, then supercharge it you could break it easily. Quote:
Well you have to understand Powerchoke diesels are worthless, after 100,000 miles they are worn out and are ready to die, a Cummins will outlast a Navistar any day of the week. |
Re: 2.0 Ecotec 260HP I'm sorry, but that statement is completely meaningless in any kind of context. It's something you typically hear from engine tuners who really do not understand basic principles and work from hearsay and trial and error and get their technical info from advertisements in hot rod magazines. (Not meaning you personally, of course). We've discussed the relationship of horsepower and torque to death in other threads and if you are working with geared engines, torque can always be matched to your particular requirements, but the bottom line is hp.
"Aeronautical engineering is highly educated guessing, worked out to five decimal places." |
Re: 2.0 Ecotec 260HP Quote:
What are you answering here? Lost me.... Quote:
|
Re: 2.0 Ecotec 260HP There are other ways of increasing torque. You can increase torque by a lot of things not just VE. Engines like cars can be manipulated to increase their power. The problem is people don't understand today because they are used to modern High compression High RPM engines. You can't make gas torque monsters using High RPM engines, you will engine up with a unreliable motor, whcih would be useless. Quote:
But when i was reading into airplane engines i noticed that torque allows you fly faster, when used with a larger proepller at a lower RPM. while the lower the HP the lower the altitude, the higher th HP the higher the altitude. Am i correct on this? If not then explain where torque falls into the airplane/propeller saga, because that is where the unknown is. But then again comparing boats to airplanes im not so sure of, understanding motors however i do know, And i don't read those hot rod mags, i never learned that way, i learned through work, and how to tune engines to get what we wanted out of them. The problem with Hot Rod magizines is they don't explain the theory or the reason behinding doing somethign the correct way. They just say use JE Pistons or elderbroc headers, etic. they don't explain that you need larger oil holes, that you should bluemark and balance the engine, etic... |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
| |
![]() |
Similar Threads | ![]() |
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| profili 2.0 | handprop | Aircraft Design / Aerodynamics / New Technology | 5 | May 6th, 2009 03:58 PM |
| HBA 2.0 Coming Soon! | Jman | Hangar Flying | 55 | October 6th, 2008 12:56 PM |
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.0 |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4 Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. |