+ Reply to Thread
Page 16 of 18 FirstFirst ... 6101112131415161718 LastLast
Results 226 to 240 of 259
Like Tree20Likes

Thread: Paul Weston Sea-Era

  1. #226
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Russij
    Posts
    89

    Re: Paul Weston Sea-Era



    the fuselage executed in the form of a wing of small lengthening, центроплан, consoles I covered, the power plant, tail plumage, the chassis with management mechanisms, it is supplied with the poles located on each side центроплана and along its axis of symmetry, rigidly fixed on its bottom surface and supplied not movably fixed at the bottom end faces of poles underwater wings, at this chassis it is executed wheel, and mechanisms of management of the chassis are placed in poles.

    In process of speed increase from 0 to the speed of effective work of underwater wings the amphibian comes to a surface of the water, overcoming power factors of interaction with water.
    By the time of an exit to gliding the air passable between a surface of the water and the bottom surface центроплана 1, withheld from an overflowing from sides by poles 2, thanks to narrowing of the channel slows down, being transformed to pressure surpassing atmospheric, i.e. Rn> Ro, and creating effect of the dynamic airbag


    With a further growth of speed power parameters of the airbag increase, tearing off the amphibian surfaces of wings 6 and 7 from a water surface, providing that in contactless movement with water a fast gain of speed and transfer to keeping and to ascent.
    Further flight of the amphibian up to passing of a point of alignment when landing doesn't differ the dynamics from the plane with being cleaned wheel chassis.

  2. #227
    Registered User Himat's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    881

    Re: Paul Weston Sea-Era

    Quote Originally Posted by qxev View Post
    I haven't enough material in order that


    "to open a new stream"


    I introduced couple of ideas, for discussion...


    probably, these thoughts will be useful to other people.


    probably, their thoughts will be useful to me

    83 posts, mostly in this thread should be enough material for a new "stream".

    Your thoughts would be even more interesting if you elaborated more in the text. A somewhat broader discussion could then maybe be had too.

    I do find your pictures interesting, but I would like to have them presented in one thread to better keep track of them.


    And I repeat as you posted as I edited:
    Do post and upload pictures.
    Do not embed a link to another site in the pictures without notifying other readers. I, and probably several others do then not open the link as it could be considered a security threat. Especially when it's a "hidden" link and the poster do post nothing but pictures and one line "text's" on this and other forums.
    Last edited by Himat; March 3rd, 2013 at 03:30 AM.

  3. #228
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Roseau, Dominica.
    Posts
    362

    Re: Paul Weston Sea-Era

    Quote Originally Posted by jedi View Post
    I would say no.


    Jedi

    I misunderstood this sentence

    "I generally set power and speed at about 50 feet or more and let it slowly 85 mph and two feet off the surface. I will have to try it sometime. It is very comfortable at 2,400 rpm and is pitch and drift down to about ten feet and then hold altitude."

    Armour.

  4. #229
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Russij
    Posts
    89

    Re: Paul Weston Sea-Era

    Quote Originally Posted by Himat View Post
    Do not embed a link to another site in the pictures without notifying other readers. I, and probably several others do then not open the link as it could be considered a security threat..
    links in pictures, not because so it is pleasant to me...


    if you know a hosting of pictures where there is no hosting advertizing, I ask to tell me... and I will use with pleasure

    and I can leave from this forum if to you it is so better

  5. #230
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Sahuarita Arizona, Renton Washington, USA
    Posts
    361

    Re: Paul Weston Sea-Era

    Quote Originally Posted by captarmour View Post
    Jedi

    I misunderstood this sentence

    "I generally set power and speed at about 50 feet or more and let it slowly 85 mph and two feet off the surface. I will have to try it sometime. It is very comfortable at 2,400 rpm and is pitch and drift down to about ten feet and then hold altitude."

    Armour.
    Sorry, it must have been late. You are right that it is confusing. I have left out some words.

    I will set power to 2,400 rpm and fly at higher speed, about 90 mph, to decend to about 50 feet. At 50 feet I will slow to 85, trim and make a small power adjustment if necessary. Power set is not quiet enough to hold altitude and speed. The aircraft continues to decend into ground effect where drag decreases and power is now sufficient to maintane altitude and speed. It is not at all difficult to hold altitude but I do not know that the aircraft would hold altitude hands off. I believe your question was if the aircraft would hold altitude without pilot input. This was answered by the "no".

    The aircraft is stable and therefore would continue in the trim condition without disturbance. However, in practice with not perfect trim and disturpances such as turning flight to follow the shoreline or avoid overflying boats it is necessary to control altitude with pitch control.

    Like I previously offered, next opertunity, with calm conditions, I can try the controls free test. However, our launch facility opens at 9 or 10 am so most of our flying is in the afternoon and not in the calm morning air.

  6. #231
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Roseau, Dominica.
    Posts
    362

    Re: Paul Weston Sea-Era

    Thanks a mil, really appreciate your observations.

    What I'm trying to determine is, is the pitch up or 'altitude hold' in GE due to cp movement or the increased speed(efficiency) in GE?

    If its calm enough maybe you could tell by observing if the pitch up or altitude hold leads the speed increase or the speed increases and then it pitches up or maintains height.

    if the pitch up or altitude hold leads the speed increase it may mean the cp is moving forward IGE. It may be that if the speed increase is significant it may naturally find a higher GE height due to the increase in dynamic pressure, but the important thing is that it would not keep climbing as when the cp is moving forward with height increase as it would with a rectangular wing.

    please be careful.

  7. #232
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,243

    Re: Paul Weston Sea-Era

    Jedi,

    If, as you stated, "Normal sea level cruise 100 mph at 2600 rpm and 3.2 gph" that means the flat plate drag of the Sea-Era is 4.6 sft, assuming 80% on the prop, sea level, and 25% engine efficiency. Not as good as I would have thought at 3.5 sft.

    Can you give me some more data so that I can better determine the drag? Perhaps at 100, 110, 120, and 130 mph?

    In comparison, my Q200 was around 2 sft, or less than half, but it landed fast... 170 mph on 5.5 gph... The seaplane ability costs a lot.



    Holden

  8. #233
    Registered User bmcj's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Fresno, California
    Posts
    6,517

    Re: Paul Weston Sea-Era

    Quote Originally Posted by qxev View Post
    links in pictures, not because so it is pleasant to me...if you know a hosting of pictures where there is no hosting advertizing, I ask to tell me... and I will use with pleasureand I can leave from this forum if to you it is so better
    When you attach a picture, make sure you check the "Retrieve remote file and reference locally" box.

    Name:  Pic Import.jpg
Views: 387
Size:  32.2 KB


    P.S. - I agree with the others.... you should create a thread of your own to show your ideas and allow comments on them. Otherwise, you have multiple topics being discussed in one thread and it can become confusing.

    If you are not sure how to post a new thread, follow this link and it will get you started with a new thread in the Aircraft Design section:

    http://www.homebuiltairplanes.com/fo...newthread&f=61

    Bruce
    Last edited by bmcj; March 4th, 2013 at 05:22 PM.

  9. #234
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Sahuarita Arizona, Renton Washington, USA
    Posts
    361

    Re: Paul Weston Sea-Era

    Quote Originally Posted by Holden View Post
    Jedi,

    If, as you stated, "Normal sea level cruise 100 mph at 2600 rpm and 3.2 gph" that means the flat plate drag of the Sea-Era is 4.6 sft, assuming 80% on the prop, sea level, and 25% engine efficiency. Not as good as I would have thought at 3.5 sft.

    Can you give me some more data so that I can better determine the drag? Perhaps at 100, 110, 120, and 130 mph?

    In comparison, my Q200 was around 2 sft, or less than half, but it landed fast... 170 mph on 5.5 gph... The seaplane ability costs a lot.



    Holden
    Do not put too much faith in the accuracy of the numbers presented. They are "by memory" numbers and not from a formal drag test program. I will try to get better numbers this summer.

    I would like to see your method of calculation. Did you use fuel flow to calculate power? If so the fuel flow number is what is used for flight planning and is conservative probably by as much as 20% or more and is baised on total fuel flow for the flight not a specific cruise condition. The aircraft does have a Grand Rapids Techonology engine moniter but I can not vouch for the accuracy. I have noted some rather low fuel flow numbers that I did not trust.

    If you did not use fuel flow how was power calculated without a manifold pressure which is not instrumented on the aircraft? (Readding your post, you have answered this. The question is for other readers understanding of the process.)

    I could do a glide test with an airspeed / vertical speed plot. The aircrft has done several engine out landings.

  10. #235
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,243

    Re: Paul Weston Sea-Era

    Quote Originally Posted by jedi View Post
    Do not put too much faith in the accuracy of the numbers presented. They are "by memory" numbers and not from a formal drag test program. I will try to get better numbers this summer.

    I would like to see your method of calculation. Did you use fuel flow to calculate power? If so the fuel flow number is what is used for flight planning and is conservative probably by as much as 20% or more and is baised on total fuel flow for the flight not a specific cruise condition. The aircraft does have a Grand Rapids Techonology engine moniter but I can not vouch for the accuracy. I have noted some rather low fuel flow numbers that I did not trust.

    If you did not use fuel flow how was power calculated without a manifold pressure which is not instrumented on the aircraft? (Readding your post, you have answered this. The question is for other readers understanding of the process.)

    I could do a glide test with an airspeed / vertical speed plot. The aircrft has done several engine out landings.
    Jedi,

    I have a program that calculates it. I assumed 25% engine efficiency, 80% on the prop, sea level. Rough guess from limited data. I know what my Q200 performance was, along with other airplanes, and it seems to be about right as a comparison. It would be nice to know how it does faster because the induced drag of the delta at slow speeds (100 mph) might create a higher drag number than fast.

    Holden
    Last edited by Holden; March 6th, 2013 at 12:39 AM.

  11. #236
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Roseau, Dominica.
    Posts
    362

  12. #237
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    HR 9A
    Posts
    39

  13. #238
    Registered User Himat's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    881

    Re: Paul Weston Sea-Era

    "He was able to taxi back to shore..." after the crash?
    More at: Man crashes experimental plane in Lake Sammamish, again : The Issaquah Press – News, Sports, Classifieds and More in Issaquah, WA

    Ground looped might have been a more apropiate term?

  14. #239
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Sahuarita Arizona, Renton Washington, USA
    Posts
    361

    Red face Re: Paul Weston Sea-Era Incident 03 04 2013

    Quote Originally Posted by 9aplus View Post

    I talked to Paul on the phone and will report details as given.
    Weather was NE wind, across and down the lake; I believe about 12 to 15 knots. Waves 15 inches. He attempted takeoff with 10 degrees of flap and found the ride very rough and difficult to obtain take off speed of 60 mph. About 50 mph he started to porpoise and contacted the left wing tip and again bounced into the air. He cut power and on the next contact with the water the right wing dug in and spun him around damaging the wing spar attachment in the fuselage and both tail booms. Repairs will be made later in the year.
    Analysis:
    Paul realized the weather was marginal but expected it would be a good evaluation of the plane. Because of the winter weather he had not flown much recently and currency was likely a factor considering his relatively low hours.

    1. He should have taxied across the lake to calmer water, at least for the first takeoff.
    2. He should have aborted sooner.
    3. Good weather in Seattle in the winter is a rare occasion he got flying fever and could not resist.
    4. Flap 0 takeoff would have been a better choice perhaps.

  15. #240
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,243

    Re: Paul Weston Sea-Era Incident 03 04 2013

    Quote Originally Posted by jedi View Post
    I talked to Paul on the phone and will report details as given.
    Weather was NE wind, across and down the lake; I believe about 12 to 15 knots. Waves 15 inches. He attempted takeoff with 10 degrees of flap and found the ride very rough and difficult to obtain take off speed of 60 mph. About 50 mph he started to porpoise and contacted the left wing tip and again bounced into the air. He cut power and on the next contact with the water the right wing dug in and spun him around damaging the wing spar attachment in the fuselage and both tail booms. Repairs will be made later in the year.
    Analysis:
    Paul realized the weather was marginal but expected it would be a good evaluation of the plane. Because of the winter weather he had not flown much recently and currency was likely a factor considering his relatively low hours.

    1. He should have taxied across the lake to calmer water, at least for the first takeoff.
    2. He should have aborted sooner.
    3. Good weather in Seattle in the winter is a rare occasion he got flying fever and could not resist.
    4. Flap 0 takeoff would have been a better choice perhaps.
    Jedi,

    Thanks for the report.

    Sorry to hear the news about Paul. I hope Paul is not hurt. Looks like he had some bandages in one report. It happened March 4, over 11 days ago.

    Here is what wikipedia says about the number 86.

    86 is the 25th distinct semiprime and the 13th of the form (2.q). The aliquot sum of 86 is 46 within the aliquot sequence (86,46,26,16,15,9,4,3,1,0) 86 being the 17th composite number in the 3-aliquot tree.
    86 is the middle number in the second cluster of three discrete semiprimes between 85 and 87 being themselves discrete semiprimes.
    86 is a semiprime, nontotient, a noncototient, a happy number, and a self number. It appears in the Padovan sequence, preceded by the terms 37, 49, 65 (it is the sum of the first two of these).
    Since it is possible to find sequences of 86 consecutive integers such that each inner member member shares a factor with either the first or the last member, 86 is an Erdős–Woods number.
    86 is a repdigit in base 6 (222).

    86 is the atomic number of radon. There are 86 metals on the modern periodic table

    86'd
    To get rid of, originally for killing someone. The phrase "80 miles out and 6 feet under" was reserved for someone who had to dig their own grave 80 miles from civilization and then get shot execution-style. All terms for 86'd originated from this, be it alcohol or eliminating.

    "86","86'd", "86ed", or eighty-sixed when used as a verb in American English, is a slang term for refusing service or getting rid of something.


    Maybe Paul should not be a test pilot at 86 years old?

    Holden
    Last edited by Holden; March 15th, 2013 at 05:41 PM.

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Sea Eagle
    By Kookaburra in forum General Experimental Aviation Questions
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: July 29th, 2010, 12:33 AM
  2. Amazing compilation. Sea Wreckage.
    By Mac790 in forum Warbirds / Warbird Replicas
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: July 11th, 2010, 04:54 AM
  3. Air mail in an earlier and more optimistic era
    By Dana in forum Hangar Flying
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: April 4th, 2010, 11:26 AM
  4. 1930s Era BRS
    By Jman in forum Rules and Regulations / Flight Safety / Better Pilots
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: May 30th, 2008, 02:28 PM
  5. Paul Poberezny
    By PatrickW in forum Hangar Flying
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: March 16th, 2006, 09:08 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts