• Welcome aboard HomebuiltAirplanes.com, your destination for connecting with a thriving community of more than 10,000 active members, all passionate about home-built aviation. Dive into our comprehensive repository of knowledge, exchange technical insights, arrange get-togethers, and trade aircrafts/parts with like-minded enthusiasts. Unearth a wide-ranging collection of general and kit plane aviation subjects, enriched with engaging imagery, in-depth technical manuals, and rare archives.

    For a nominal fee of $99.99/year or $12.99/month, you can immerse yourself in this dynamic community and unparalleled treasure-trove of aviation knowledge.

    Embark on your journey now!

    Click Here to Become a Premium Member and Experience Homebuilt Airplanes to the Fullest!

Twin boom tails connected or not connected

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

karoliina.t.salminen

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2008
Messages
407
Location
Finland
I was looking Northrop Firebird three view picture (here):
Bayou Renaissance Man: A new contender in the unmanned aerial vehicle stakes

Also Jay's concep has separate tails. And all new Rutan designs as well.

I did not see it in the videos, but this three view picture shows that the twin boom tails are disconnected from center from each other. I have been discussing about this, more so a week ago in Oshkosh - I have heard claims that the two booms interfere with each other and can start amplifying each other's flutter. Is that the reason why they are separate on this? Common sense would say that there would be weight savings for having the tail connected, but could somebody explain why it isn't so if it isn't so.
- What are the benefits and drawbacks of having them connected like on Adam A500 and Rutan Boomerang? Are there aerodynamic drawbacks from this?
- What are the benefits and drawbacks of having them separate like on for example in this Northrop Firebird? Any aerodynamic benefits?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top